Key Points:
-
A consortium of abortion clinics have sued Pennsylvania, arguing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should force taxpayers to fund abortion and to find (invent) a right to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
-
A win for the abortion industry in this case would force taxpayer funding of abortion, and would likely establish a right to an abortion in Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
-
If abortion is declared a constitutional right in Pennsylvania, all current and future pro-life regulations would be in jeopardy of being struck down
The Threat
The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.
The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should declare a right to abortion and taxpayer-funded abortions in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
A win for the abortion industry in this case would not only force taxpayers to fund abortion, but a court-imposed state-constitutional “right to abortion” could lead to all of Pennsylvania’s current pro-life laws being struck down,and could result in legalizing abortion right up until birth, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Any future pro-life laws enacted to protect women’s health and preborn babies lives would likely be struck down under such a ruling. Current pro-life regulations in the Abortion Control Act, such as the 24-hour waiting period requirements, informed consent, and 24 week abortion limit would be in jeopardy of being repealed and ruled unconstitutional. The same is true with abortion clinic regulations put into place to protect women, passed into our law after the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors” scandal.
In addition to the lawsuit, the Abortion Industry is also trying the legislative route. House Bill 1888 would also create a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion in Pennsylvania’s constitution and remove our current pro-life protections.
The Lawsuit Status:
The Commonwealth Court ruled against the abortion industry in the Allegheny Reproductive v. Pennsylvania case on March 26, 2021. But the abortion industry appealed to the PA Supreme Court. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that there is no “fundamental right” to abortion, but three justices (Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht) overruled longstanding precedent that prohibited taxpayer funding of elective abortions. Justices Donohue and Wecht expressed interest in recognizing a right to abortion, while Justices Sally Mundy and Debra Todd dissented, with Mundy arguing the issue should be resolved by the political branches, not the courts. Justice Kevin Brobson abstained, and there was a vacancy on the court. The case was remanded to the Commonwealth Court, which heard oral arguments in February 2025. Governor Josh Shapiro’s administration had announced early on that they would not defend the law but would advocate for striking down the Medicaid funding ban.
Conclusion:
If the Abortion Industry gets their way, the PA Supreme Court ruling would force state taxpayer funding of abortions, strike down parental consent and 24 hour waiting period requirements, end health and safety regulations to protect women at abortion clinics, and worse. And any future legislation to protect women and babies would be found unconstitutional. Pennsylvania would join a list of states where lawsuits have already resulted in those state supreme courts “finding” a right to abortion in their constitutions, thereby striking down pro-life laws just like ours.

Related Articles
8 Things To Do If You’re Upset over Planned Parenthood
By: Dan Bartkowiak If you're like me, you're rather upset and disgusted at the video that shows Planned Parenthood's Senior Director of Medical Services casually eating dinner while discussing their practice of selling body parts from aborted babies. As frustrating as...
Advertisement shows financial profit for Planned Parenthood on selling baby parts
By now I hope you've watched - or at least know about - the video released by the Center for Medical Progress that shows a Planned Parenthood senior employee casually eating dinner while discussing their practice of selling body parts from aborted babies. (And I hope...
Planned Parenthood caught on camera discussing illegal sale of body parts from aborted babies
Sadly there's another reason why Planned Parenthood should not be receiving a dime of taxpayer dollars in Pennsylvania (they currently receive millions): Planned Parenthood Federation of America's Senior Director of Medical Services, Dr. Deborah Nucatola, is caught on...
Protect Your Freedom – Resources for your church, ministry, business and school.
The Supreme Court’s decision to redefine marriage has staggering implications for religious freedom, and the ability for individuals, for-profit businesses, non-profit businesses, religious schools and ministries to freely operate in accordance with their faith...
Pro-Life & Pro-Marriage: Connecting Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges
The Supreme Court's decision to redefine marriage may be the most destructive ruling since Roe v. Wade - dividing our nation and setting the stage for future attacks on the family. For Roe v. Wade and now Obergefell v. Hodges, there is a connection between the two -...
9 Ways Redefining Marriage Impacts Your World
This list courtesy of Focus on the Family. With the Supreme Court ruling to redefine marriage, we will continue to see religious freedom taking a back seat to sexual freedom in many facets of society: Harms Children: Redefining marriage denies children of same-sex...
PA newspaper BANS letters/op-eds supporting marriage between husband/wife
By: Dan Bartkowiak Five Supreme Court Justices - five people - have redefined marriage for an entire nation. Justice Roberts wrote in his dissent that: Today’s decision, for example, creates serious questions about religious liberty. Many good and decent people oppose...
Marriage is not what the Supreme Court says it is
Pennsylvania Family Institute will continue to stand for marriage between man and woman. (Harrisburg, PA) June 26, 2015 - Today, in a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for states to define marriage as the union of one man...