Issue
Keep Abortion Out of Pennsylvania’s Constitution
KEY POINTS
- A consortium of abortion clinics have sued Pennsylvania, arguing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should force taxpayers to fund abortion and to find (invent) a right to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
- A win for the abortion industry in this case would force taxpayer funding of abortion, and would likely establish a right to an abortion in Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
- If abortion is declared a constitutional right in Pennsylvania, all current and future pro-life regulations would be in jeopardy of being struck down
- The Pennsylvania State House passed HB1957 in December of 2025, a bill that would amend the Pennsylvania State Constitution to create a right to abortion on-demand until birth. It is expected to not be considered by Republican leadership in the Senate.
TAKE ACTION
Tell your legislators to OPPOSE HB1957
Act Now
The Threat
The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.
The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should declare a right to abortion and taxpayer-funded abortions in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
A win for the abortion industry in this case would not only force taxpayers to fund abortion, but a court-imposed state-constitutional “right to abortion” could lead to all of Pennsylvania’s current pro-life laws being struck down,and could result in legalizing abortion right up until birth, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Any future pro-life laws enacted to protect women’s health and preborn babies lives would likely be struck down under such a ruling. Current pro-life regulations in the Abortion Control Act, such as the 24-hour waiting period requirements, informed consent, and 24 week abortion limit would be in jeopardy of being repealed and ruled unconstitutional. The same is true with abortion clinic regulations put into place to protect women, passed into our law after the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors” scandal.
In addition to the lawsuit, the Abortion Industry is also trying the legislative route. House Bill 1957 would also create a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion in Pennsylvania’s constitution and remove our current pro-life protections.
The Lawsuit Status
The Commonwealth Court ruled against the abortion industry in the Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania case on March 26, 2021. The abortion industry appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which ruled that there is no “fundamental right” to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution. However, by a slim majority, the Court overturned a 40-year precedent that had prohibited taxpayer funding of elective abortions.
Three justices—Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht—overruled the longstanding precedent barring taxpayer-funded abortions. Justices Donohue and Wecht expressed interest in recognizing a constitutional right to abortion. Two justices—Sally Mundy and Debra Todd—dissented, with Justice Mundy arguing that the issue should be resolved by the political branches, not the courts. Justice Kevin Brobson abstained, and there was a vacancy on the court at the time.
The case was remanded back to the Commonwealth Court, which heard oral arguments again on November 5, 2025, in Pittsburgh. The case is expected to return to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for final resolution.
Conclusion
If the Abortion Industry gets their way, the PA Supreme Court ruling would force state taxpayer funding of abortions, strike down parental consent and 24 hour waiting period requirements, end health and safety regulations to protect women at abortion clinics, and worse. And any future legislation to protect women and babies would be found unconstitutional. Pennsylvania would join a list of states where lawsuits have already resulted in those state supreme courts “finding” a right to abortion in their constitutions, thereby striking down pro-life laws just like ours.
Related Articles
New Report Shows Good News for Those with Down Syndrome
Today, in the Philly Inquirer, our friends at Susan B. Anthony List in D.C. highlight a new report showing good news for those with Down syndrome – extended life span, other physical treatments to improve quality of life, etc. Read the article. Unfortunately, many...
One Lawmaker Says You Don’t Deserve ‘A Place at the Table’!
No doubt you’ve read our warnings about two pieces of legislation being considered by our state senate and state house. Since June when a single federal judge overturned Pennsylvania’s marriage law declaring it unconstitutional, there has been a renewed push to grant...
Religious Liberty Threats Follow Marriage Redefinition
by Brandon McGinley It has long been contended by proponents of the traditional definition of marriage that with the abandonment of that definition will come assaults to the religious liberties we have long taken for granted. Naturally, those predictions were...
5 Things Worth Considering About the Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Decision
By Julie Blattenberger and Elijah Coryell 1. Hobby Lobby DOES provide contraceptive care for women. The Green family provides 16 of the 20 FDA-approved forms of contraceptive care. Their family’s religious conscience only objects to 4 drugs and devices which they...
Hallelujah! Victory for the Hahns, Religious Freedom
Freedom is the Ultimate Winner in Conestoga Wood and Hobby Lobby Supreme Court Decision Pennsylvania Family Institute applauds ruling as important First Amendment victory Liberty in America was affirmed and protected today as the United States Supreme Court sided with...
Pray for the Hahns Sunday – June 29
On Monday, June 30 the U.S. Supreme Court will issue their ruling on whether all Americans, including family business owners like the Hahns and their wood cabinet business in Lancaster County, are free to live and work according to their beliefs without fear of...
My View from the March For Marriage
by Elijah Coryell, intern, PA Family Institute Last Thursday, over 2,000 attendees rallied and marched on the U.S. Supreme Court to take a stand for the traditional definition of marriage. For a second year, the March for Marriage, planned by the National Organization...
State Representatives Support Clerk’s Appeal for Marriage
From Pennlive.com: Twenty Republican House members signed a letter addressed to Schuylkill County Register of Wills Theresa Santai-Gaffney supporting her decision to legally intervene against the May 20th decision by U.S. Middle District Court Judge John Jones...




