Issue
Keep Abortion Out of Pennsylvania’s Constitution
KEY POINTS
- A consortium of abortion clinics have sued Pennsylvania, arguing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should force taxpayers to fund abortion and to find (invent) a right to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
- A win for the abortion industry in this case would force taxpayer funding of abortion, and would likely establish a right to an abortion in Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
- If abortion is declared a constitutional right in Pennsylvania, all current and future pro-life regulations would be in jeopardy of being struck down
- The Pennsylvania State House passed HB1957 in December of 2025, a bill that would amend the Pennsylvania State Constitution to create a right to abortion on-demand until birth. It is expected to not be considered by Republican leadership in the Senate.
TAKE ACTION
Tell your legislators to OPPOSE HB1957
Act Now
The Threat
The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.
The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should declare a right to abortion and taxpayer-funded abortions in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
A win for the abortion industry in this case would not only force taxpayers to fund abortion, but a court-imposed state-constitutional “right to abortion” could lead to all of Pennsylvania’s current pro-life laws being struck down,and could result in legalizing abortion right up until birth, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Any future pro-life laws enacted to protect women’s health and preborn babies lives would likely be struck down under such a ruling. Current pro-life regulations in the Abortion Control Act, such as the 24-hour waiting period requirements, informed consent, and 24 week abortion limit would be in jeopardy of being repealed and ruled unconstitutional. The same is true with abortion clinic regulations put into place to protect women, passed into our law after the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors” scandal.
In addition to the lawsuit, the Abortion Industry is also trying the legislative route. House Bill 1957 would also create a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion in Pennsylvania’s constitution and remove our current pro-life protections.
The Lawsuit Status
The Commonwealth Court ruled against the abortion industry in the Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania case on March 26, 2021. The abortion industry appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which ruled that there is no “fundamental right” to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution. However, by a slim majority, the Court overturned a 40-year precedent that had prohibited taxpayer funding of elective abortions.
Three justices—Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht—overruled the longstanding precedent barring taxpayer-funded abortions. Justices Donohue and Wecht expressed interest in recognizing a constitutional right to abortion. Two justices—Sally Mundy and Debra Todd—dissented, with Justice Mundy arguing that the issue should be resolved by the political branches, not the courts. Justice Kevin Brobson abstained, and there was a vacancy on the court at the time.
The case was remanded back to the Commonwealth Court, which heard oral arguments again on November 5, 2025, in Pittsburgh. The case is expected to return to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for final resolution.
Conclusion
If the Abortion Industry gets their way, the PA Supreme Court ruling would force state taxpayer funding of abortions, strike down parental consent and 24 hour waiting period requirements, end health and safety regulations to protect women at abortion clinics, and worse. And any future legislation to protect women and babies would be found unconstitutional. Pennsylvania would join a list of states where lawsuits have already resulted in those state supreme courts “finding” a right to abortion in their constitutions, thereby striking down pro-life laws just like ours.
Related Articles
Pennsylvania Tied to New HHS Report on Widespread Fraud with Sex-Rejecting Interventions
There are wolves in Pennsylvania. And they’re wearing white coats. A shocking new report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reveals widespread fraud by doctors and hospitals involved in “gender medicine,” with evidence of shady insurance...
What We’re Watching: Shapiro Administration Publishes School Vaccine Rate Database, Raising Privacy, Religious Freedom Concerns
The Shapiro administration recently published a database of vaccinations across Pennsylvania. The breakout statistics show percentages of students vaccinated by school, including private religious schools. Most troubling, the percentage of students claiming religious...
PCUSA Transgender Resolution Rejects Biblical Truth and Biological Reality
By Josue Sierra, The Pennsylvania Family Institute exists to defend religious liberty, protect the family, and advance public policy rooted in truth. That same commitment led us to file an amicus brief before the U.S. Supreme Court affirming a simple reality:...
Response to House Democrats’ Attempt to Misrepresent Their Vote to Restrict School Choice in Pennsylvania
By: Dan Bartkowiak, Chief Strategy Officer Pennsylvania House Democrats are busy trying to explain their vote on House Bill 2632, legislation that would take Pennsylvania’s successful tax credit scholarship programs and replace it with a weaker, more restrictive...
PA House Votes to Restrict PA’s Student Scholarship Programs. Here’s What Happened.
"Pennsylvania House Democrats voted to limit education choice, restrict scholarship access for low-income families, and close doors for students across our Commonwealth. Lawmakers should stand with Pennsylvania families: reject these cuts, expand scholarship...
Eleven Years After Obergefell, Americans Are Asking the Right Question Again
By Josue Sierra, Eleven years ago this week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, redefining marriage nationwide. At the time, supporters promised the debate was over. Americans were told the country had reached a new consensus and that...
Take Action: New Attack on Education Opportunities in PA
By Dan Bartkowiak, Chief Strategy Officer, UPDATE: HB2632 passed the PA House by a vote of 105-97. Click here for the roll call vote. Join us in praying that this bill is not taken up by the PA Senate. Right now, thousands of children need your help. There's a new...
Pennsylvania Family Institute Joins National Movement Spotlighting First-Ever Children’s Rights Scorecard–Do State Laws Fail or Protect Children?
Harrisburg, PA – Today, Pennsylvania Family Institute joined a national movement spotlighting a first of its kind Children’s Rights Scorecard exposing how laws across states impact children, entirely reshaping how public policy is viewed and crafted. The scorecard’s...








