Issue
Keep Abortion Out of Pennsylvania’s Constitution
KEY POINTS
- A consortium of abortion clinics have sued Pennsylvania, arguing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should force taxpayers to fund abortion and to find (invent) a right to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
- A win for the abortion industry in this case would force taxpayer funding of abortion, and would likely establish a right to an abortion in Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
- If abortion is declared a constitutional right in Pennsylvania, all current and future pro-life regulations would be in jeopardy of being struck down
- The Pennsylvania State House passed HB1957 in December of 2025, a bill that would amend the Pennsylvania State Constitution to create a right to abortion on-demand until birth. It is expected to not be considered by Republican leadership in the Senate.
TAKE ACTION
Tell your legislators to OPPOSE HB1957
Act Now
The Threat
The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.
The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should declare a right to abortion and taxpayer-funded abortions in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
A win for the abortion industry in this case would not only force taxpayers to fund abortion, but a court-imposed state-constitutional “right to abortion” could lead to all of Pennsylvania’s current pro-life laws being struck down,and could result in legalizing abortion right up until birth, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Any future pro-life laws enacted to protect women’s health and preborn babies lives would likely be struck down under such a ruling. Current pro-life regulations in the Abortion Control Act, such as the 24-hour waiting period requirements, informed consent, and 24 week abortion limit would be in jeopardy of being repealed and ruled unconstitutional. The same is true with abortion clinic regulations put into place to protect women, passed into our law after the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors” scandal.
In addition to the lawsuit, the Abortion Industry is also trying the legislative route. House Bill 1957 would also create a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion in Pennsylvania’s constitution and remove our current pro-life protections.
The Lawsuit Status
The Commonwealth Court ruled against the abortion industry in the Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania case on March 26, 2021. The abortion industry appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which ruled that there is no “fundamental right” to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution. However, by a slim majority, the Court overturned a 40-year precedent that had prohibited taxpayer funding of elective abortions.
Three justices—Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht—overruled the longstanding precedent barring taxpayer-funded abortions. Justices Donohue and Wecht expressed interest in recognizing a constitutional right to abortion. Two justices—Sally Mundy and Debra Todd—dissented, with Justice Mundy arguing that the issue should be resolved by the political branches, not the courts. Justice Kevin Brobson abstained, and there was a vacancy on the court at the time.
The case was remanded back to the Commonwealth Court, which heard oral arguments again on November 5, 2025, in Pittsburgh. The case is expected to return to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for final resolution.
Conclusion
If the Abortion Industry gets their way, the PA Supreme Court ruling would force state taxpayer funding of abortions, strike down parental consent and 24 hour waiting period requirements, end health and safety regulations to protect women at abortion clinics, and worse. And any future legislation to protect women and babies would be found unconstitutional. Pennsylvania would join a list of states where lawsuits have already resulted in those state supreme courts “finding” a right to abortion in their constitutions, thereby striking down pro-life laws just like ours.
Related Articles
Threat to Christian Schools is Real
Statements by a State Senator provide clear evidence that Pennsylvania Christian schools are at risk should SB 974 (the so-called "Fairness Act") become law. At issue: What happens when a Christian school dismisses a teacher for engaging in a public act contrary to...
“Today, it’s the baker; tomorrow, it’s the pastor.” Exclusive Interview with NYT Best-Selling Author Dr. Paul Kengor
The following Q&A is an exclusive interview with Professor Paul Kengor on his new book, Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage, and his views of the recent Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage. Interview...
Protect Your Freedom – Resources for your church, ministry, business and school.
The Supreme Court’s decision to redefine marriage has staggering implications for religious freedom, and the ability for individuals, for-profit businesses, non-profit businesses, religious schools and ministries to freely operate in accordance with their faith...
Pro-Life & Pro-Marriage: Connecting Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges
The Supreme Court's decision to redefine marriage may be the most destructive ruling since Roe v. Wade - dividing our nation and setting the stage for future attacks on the family. For Roe v. Wade and now Obergefell v. Hodges, there is a connection between the two -...
9 Ways Redefining Marriage Impacts Your World
This list courtesy of Focus on the Family. With the Supreme Court ruling to redefine marriage, we will continue to see religious freedom taking a back seat to sexual freedom in many facets of society: Harms Children: Redefining marriage denies children of same-sex...
PA newspaper BANS letters/op-eds supporting marriage between husband/wife
By: Dan Bartkowiak Five Supreme Court Justices - five people - have redefined marriage for an entire nation. Justice Roberts wrote in his dissent that: Today’s decision, for example, creates serious questions about religious liberty. Many good and decent people oppose...
Marriage is not what the Supreme Court says it is
Pennsylvania Family Institute will continue to stand for marriage between man and woman. (Harrisburg, PA) June 26, 2015 - Today, in a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for states to define marriage as the union of one man...
Married at First Sight? Reality Show Attacks Marriage
The sanctity of marriage and family has once again come under attack, but this time it comes in an unusual form. Married at First Sight is a television show airing on A&E’s FYI Network that has six complete strangers legally marry one another within the first few...

