Issue


Discrimination Against Religious Public School Teachers in PA

Update: The Religious Garb Bill, Senate Bill 84, has passed and been signed into law! Teachers in Pennsylvania are now free to wear religious symbols. 

Pictured, L to R: Dan Bartkowiak, Director of Communications at PA Family; Jeremy Samek, Senior Counsel at the Independence Law Center; Sen. Judy Schwank; Sen. Kristin Phillips-Hill; Hank Butler of the Jewish Coalition; Eric Failing of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference; and Tom Shaheen, Vice President for  Policy at PA Family.

Key Points:

Pennsylvania was the last state in the U.S. with a law that unconstitutionally discriminates against teachers’ wearing of any religious garb.

The old ban on religious garb for teachers was originally enacted in order to target Catholic teachers.

Public school teachers wearing religious garb does not violate the Establishment Clause. For example, a Jewish teacher may wear a yamaka, a Catholic nun may wear a habit, a Christian teacher may wear a cross, and a Sikh teacher may wear a dastaar.

The old Pennsylvania law (now thankfully updated) is both unconstitutional and constitutes illegal religious discrimination by allowing teachers to wear all manner of secular symbols while banning the wearing of religious garb or symbolism.

S.B.84 passed and repealed this law and now protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools.

The Issue 

Before SB 84, Pennsylvania law banned teachers, on penalty of a one-year suspension for a first violation and firing for a second offense, from wearing any type of religious garb, mark, emblem, or insignia indicating a teacher is a member of any religion.

The law prior to SB 84 stated:

Religious Garb, Insignia, etc., Prohibited; Penalty

(a) That no teacher in any public school shall wear in said school or while engaged in the performance of his duty as such teacher any dress, mark, emblem or insignia indicating the fact that such teacher is a member or adherent of any religious order, sect or denomination.

(b) Any teacher employed in any of the public schools of this Commonwealth, who violates the provisions of this section, shall be suspended from employment in such school for the term of one year, and in case of a second offense by the same teacher he shall be permanently disqualified from teaching in said school….

24 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 11-1112.

Pennsylvania was the very last state in our country to still have one of these antiquated prohibitions, which were promoted by the Ku Klux Klan due to its anti-Catholic sentiments. It was long overdue for Pennsylvania to remove this archaic, discriminatory, and anti-religious law from our Public School Code in order to protect religious teachers from unjust discrimination.

In 1908, a Mennonite teacher was fired from her public school job for wearing a head covering, and the Pennsylvania state court upheld the law. But in 2003, after a public school suspended an instructional assistant for wearing a cross necklace, Judge Arthur Schwab ruled in Nichol v. Arin Intermediate Unit 28 that the statute did not apply to the instructional assistant because she was employed by an intermediate unit rather than the school itself, and as such was not a teacher as defined in the statute. However, the ruling indicated the statute was likely unconstitutional if applied to teachers.

The Solution

Though some schools have stopped enforcing this law, the legislature put and end to it once and for all by passing SB 84. Now teachers in Pennsylvania won’t be put situations where they must choose to avoid the teaching profession because of the existence of this law, to avoid situations where their rights are chilled, or have to avoid situations where a school attempts to enforce this discriminatory and unconstitutional law, resulting in liability for the government. 

S.B.84 repealed this law and protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools. According to a memo from the Prime Sponsor, Senator Phillips-Hill (R-York), “The senators’ proposal would eliminate a section from the state’s Education Code that prohibits a teacher from wearing any dress, mark emblem, or insignia indicative of his or her faith or denomination.”

“A teacher should not be worried about his or her job for simply wearing a cross on a necklace. Our First Amendment rights do not end simply because a teacher walks into a classroom,” Phillips-Hill said. “The Senate Education committee took an important step to protect our First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of religious expression.”

Related Articles

Will PA Issue Fines for Views On Marriage? Not On My Watch.

Will PA Issue Fines for Views On Marriage? Not On My Watch.

Good people have been fined and put out of business in states like Colorado and New Mexico because of their views on marriage. Will that happen in Pennsylvania? Not on my watch. Look what's happened in various parts of the country: Elaine Huguenin - Fined $6,600 and...

read more
Preserve Freedom, Reject Coercion.

Preserve Freedom, Reject Coercion.

Over 75 prominent religious and thought leaders nationwide, including the Most Rev. Charles J. Chaput (Archbishop of Philadelphia), have come together as charter signatories of "Preserve Freedom, Reject Coercion," a statement that affirms every American’s freedom to...

read more
#GivingTuesday: Our needs are greater than we can provide

#GivingTuesday: Our needs are greater than we can provide

Update by Randall Wenger, Chief Counsel for the Independence Law Center As you consider making any contributions to important causes this Giving Tuesday, may I request your donation in support of growing our religious freedom outreach? We have been swamped with...

read more
PA Family Institute: Why We Do What We Do

PA Family Institute: Why We Do What We Do

  Pennsylvania Family Institute is the state's leading pro-life, pro-family advocacy organization. Your partnership with us helps to advance the core issues of life, marriage and family and religious freedom throughout the Commonwealth. Click here to contribute.

read more
Will you stand with Barronelle?

Will you stand with Barronelle?

On Tuesday, November 15th, the Washington State Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case, State of Washington v. Arlene’s Flowers. No one should be punished by the government for peacefully living and working consistent with her beliefs. Yet that's exactly...

read more

Videos

Analysis of Bostock Ruling

Conversation with Carl Trueman and Andrew Walker

Protecting Privacy and Religious Freedom – An American Ideal