Issue


Keep Abortion Out of Pennsylvania’s Constitution

 KEY POINTS

  • A consortium of abortion clinics have sued Pennsylvania, arguing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should force taxpayers to fund abortion and to find (invent) a right to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
  • A win for the abortion industry in this case would force taxpayer funding of abortion, and would likely establish a right to an abortion in Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
  • If abortion is declared a constitutional right in Pennsylvania, all current and future pro-life regulations would be in jeopardy of being struck down
  • The Pennsylvania State House passed HB1957 in December of 2025, a bill that would amend the Pennsylvania State Constitution to create a right to abortion on-demand until birth. It is expected to not be considered by Republican leadership in the Senate.

The Threat

The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.

The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should declare a right to abortion and taxpayer-funded abortions in the Pennsylvania Constitution.

A win for the abortion industry in this case would not only force taxpayers to fund abortion, but a court-imposed state-constitutional “right to abortion” could lead to all of Pennsylvania’s current pro-life laws being struck down,and could result in legalizing abortion right up until birth, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Any future pro-life laws enacted to protect women’s health and preborn babies lives would likely be struck down under such a ruling. Current pro-life regulations in the Abortion Control Act, such as the 24-hour waiting period requirements, informed consent, and 24 week abortion limit would be in jeopardy of being repealed and ruled unconstitutional. The same is true with abortion clinic regulations put into place to protect women, passed into our law after the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors” scandal.

In addition to the lawsuit, the Abortion Industry is also trying the legislative route. House Bill 1957 would also create a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion in Pennsylvania’s constitution and remove our current pro-life protections.

The Lawsuit Status

The Commonwealth Court ruled against the abortion industry in the Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania case on March 26, 2021. The abortion industry appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which ruled that there is no “fundamental right” to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution. However, by a slim majority, the Court overturned a 40-year precedent that had prohibited taxpayer funding of elective abortions.

Three justices—Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht—overruled the longstanding precedent barring taxpayer-funded abortions. Justices Donohue and Wecht expressed interest in recognizing a constitutional right to abortion. Two justices—Sally Mundy and Debra Todd—dissented, with Justice Mundy arguing that the issue should be resolved by the political branches, not the courts. Justice Kevin Brobson abstained, and there was a vacancy on the court at the time.

The case was remanded back to the Commonwealth Court, which heard oral arguments again on November 5, 2025, in Pittsburgh. The case is expected to return to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for final resolution.

Conclusion

If the Abortion Industry gets their way, the PA Supreme Court ruling would force state taxpayer funding of abortions, strike down parental consent and 24 hour waiting period requirements, end health and safety regulations to protect women at abortion clinics, and worse. And any future legislation to protect women and babies would be found unconstitutional. Pennsylvania would join a list of states where lawsuits have already resulted in those state supreme courts “finding” a right to abortion in their constitutions, thereby striking down pro-life laws just like ours.  

Related Articles

Merry Christmas from Pennsylvania Family Institute

And the angel said to them, "Fear not, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord. And this will be a sign for you: you will find a baby wrapped in...

read more

More Dangerous than a Cancer Diagnosis

While Congress and the President use the law to impose political correctness in the language we use to describe those with disabilities, they refuse to take action to end the genocide against children in the womb, especially those diagnosed with Down's syndrome....

read more

An Inspiring Family Tradition

Much like Thanksgiving, Christmas celebrations typically include large family get-togethers, culminating in a dinner feast, with family and friends gathered around the table for fellowship and food, and thankfulness to God for His provision and blessing in our lives....

read more

Sex Ed in Downingtown

Ok, so a parent or two in a local school district demand that it stop teaching abstinence only sex education, and require teaching of "comprehensive" sex ed. They claim that teaching young people that abstinence is the best way to avoid sexually transmitted diseases...

read more

Longtime PFI Friend Wins Key Post in Congress

Pro-abortion bloggers are upset that Congressman Joe Pitts (R) (Lancaster/Berks/Chester) has been appointed to a key post that will allow him to advance a pro-life agenda in Congress, and to fight key abortion components in Obamacare. The New York Times has a story...

read more

Ready to Protect Your Child’s Religious Expression

From attorney Randall Wenger: I just received a call today about a public high school student who was told he could not sing a song in school simply because it was a Christian song. ‘Tis the Season, I suppose. Many of our public schools are bent on censoring anything...

read more

Christian Chastity vs Sex in the City

In this video speech, Dr. Pat Fagan of the Family Research Council shows how the Western standard of monogamy is under serious attack. Worth watching. http://www.frc.org/events/culture-clash-in-the-us-monogamy-vs-polyandry

read more

How the Family Fared in Pennsylvania 2010 Elections

For Governor, Pennsylvania voters elected Attorney General Tom Corbett over Dan Onorato by a decisive ten-point margin. The race for U.S. Senate was much tighter, with Pat Toomey winning by two percentage points statewide. Come January 2011, Corbett should be a...

read more