Issue
Discrimination Against Religious Public School Teachers in PA
Update: The Religious Garb Bill, Senate Bill 84, has passed and been signed into law! Teachers in Pennsylvania are now free to wear religious symbols.

Pictured, L to R: Dan Bartkowiak, Director of Communications at PA Family; Jeremy Samek, Senior Counsel at the Independence Law Center; Sen. Judy Schwank; Sen. Kristin Phillips-Hill; Hank Butler of the Jewish Coalition; Eric Failing of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference; and Tom Shaheen, Vice President for Policy at PA Family.
Key Points:
Pennsylvania was the last state in the U.S. with a law that unconstitutionally discriminates against teachers’ wearing of any religious garb.
The old ban on religious garb for teachers was originally enacted in order to target Catholic teachers.
Public school teachers wearing religious garb does not violate the Establishment Clause. For example, a Jewish teacher may wear a yamaka, a Catholic nun may wear a habit, a Christian teacher may wear a cross, and a Sikh teacher may wear a dastaar.
The old Pennsylvania law (now thankfully updated) is both unconstitutional and constitutes illegal religious discrimination by allowing teachers to wear all manner of secular symbols while banning the wearing of religious garb or symbolism.
S.B.84 passed and repealed this law and now protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools.
The Issue
Before SB 84, Pennsylvania law banned teachers, on penalty of a one-year suspension for a first violation and firing for a second offense, from wearing any type of religious garb, mark, emblem, or insignia indicating a teacher is a member of any religion.
The law prior to SB 84 stated:
Religious Garb, Insignia, etc., Prohibited; Penalty
(a) That no teacher in any public school shall wear in said school or while engaged in the performance of his duty as such teacher any dress, mark, emblem or insignia indicating the fact that such teacher is a member or adherent of any religious order, sect or denomination.
(b) Any teacher employed in any of the public schools of this Commonwealth, who violates the provisions of this section, shall be suspended from employment in such school for the term of one year, and in case of a second offense by the same teacher he shall be permanently disqualified from teaching in said school….
Pennsylvania was the very last state in our country to still have one of these antiquated prohibitions, which were promoted by the Ku Klux Klan due to its anti-Catholic sentiments. It was long overdue for Pennsylvania to remove this archaic, discriminatory, and anti-religious law from our Public School Code in order to protect religious teachers from unjust discrimination.
In 1908, a Mennonite teacher was fired from her public school job for wearing a head covering, and the Pennsylvania state court upheld the law. But in 2003, after a public school suspended an instructional assistant for wearing a cross necklace, Judge Arthur Schwab ruled in Nichol v. Arin Intermediate Unit 28 that the statute did not apply to the instructional assistant because she was employed by an intermediate unit rather than the school itself, and as such was not a teacher as defined in the statute. However, the ruling indicated the statute was likely unconstitutional if applied to teachers.
The Solution
Though some schools have stopped enforcing this law, the legislature put and end to it once and for all by passing SB 84. Now teachers in Pennsylvania won’t be put situations where they must choose to avoid the teaching profession because of the existence of this law, to avoid situations where their rights are chilled, or have to avoid situations where a school attempts to enforce this discriminatory and unconstitutional law, resulting in liability for the government.
S.B.84 repealed this law and protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools. According to a memo from the Prime Sponsor, Senator Phillips-Hill (R-York), “The senators’ proposal would eliminate a section from the state’s Education Code that prohibits a teacher from wearing any dress, mark emblem, or insignia indicative of his or her faith or denomination.”
“A teacher should not be worried about his or her job for simply wearing a cross on a necklace. Our First Amendment rights do not end simply because a teacher walks into a classroom,” Phillips-Hill said. “The Senate Education committee took an important step to protect our First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of religious expression.”

Related Articles
Sanctity of Life Sunday Toolkit
On Sunday, January 22nd, near the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, we recognize Sanctity of Life Sunday. While Roe has joyously been overturned, this day is a time for us to appreciate the priceless value of life, created in God's image and to work towards a Commonwealth...
The (Dis)Respect for Marriage Act and Its Impact on the Church and Religious Liberty
Watch below to see our informative webinar on the deceptively-named Respect for Marriage Act. We were joined by John Stonestreet, President of the Colson Center and Breakpoint Radio Host, along with Judge Cheryl Allen, retired PA Superior Court Judge and Of Counsel at...
Conservative organization denied restaurant service for its beliefs
The Family Foundation in Virginia is part of a network of allied organizations that includes the Pennsylvania Family Institute. On November 30, 2022, just 90 minutes before The Family Foundation’s (TFF) scheduled, pre-reserved event at Metzger’s Bar and Butchery in...
Commission approves PA regulations that jeopardize speech and bodily privacy rights
By defining sex to mean sexual orientation and gender identity, new regulations invite unintended consequences (HARRISBURG, PA) By a 3-2 vote, the unelected Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC) voted today in favor of regulations that define sex in the PA...
A mother’s letter to scholarship donors: “Thankful for the chance to have a choice.”
The following is a thank you letter from a mother whose children received a scholarship through PA Family Institute's Family Choice Scholarship Program, part of the incredibly successful Education Improvement Tax Credit (EITC) and Opportunity Scholarship Tax Credit...
PA Family’s Legislative Session Highlights, A Look Ahead to 2023
Pennsylvania’s two-year legislative session (2021-2022) has wrapped up and there’s a lot that can be unpacked, with both significant victories along and a variety of challenges. Here’s a PA Family snapshot of the past session along with a look into the new session...
Huge Case at the PA Supreme Court Today (Watch the livestream here)
Today, the PA Supreme Court is hearing a monumental case that could change the course of history in our state. Today, the state's high court hears arguments for Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. PA Department of Human Services. When looking at the facts, this...
Brave Pennsylvania moms speak out in support of SB 996, parental rights
Brave moms spoke out in support of parental rights this week during a hearing considering Senate Bill 996, which aims to protect children from inappropriate sexual content in schools. SB 996, sponsored by Senator Doug Mastriano (R-Adams), will protect kids and ensure...

Videos
Analysis of Bostock Ruling
Conversation with Carl Trueman and Andrew Walker
Protecting Privacy and Religious Freedom – An American Ideal