Key Points:
-
A consortium of abortion clinics have sued Pennsylvania, arguing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should force taxpayers to fund abortion and to find (invent) a right to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
-
A win for the abortion industry in this case would force taxpayer funding of abortion, and would likely establish a right to an abortion in Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
-
If abortion is declared a constitutional right in Pennsylvania, all current and future pro-life regulations would be in jeopardy of being struck down
The Threat
The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.
The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should declare a right to abortion and taxpayer-funded abortions in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
A win for the abortion industry in this case would not only force taxpayers to fund abortion, but a court-imposed state-constitutional “right to abortion” could lead to all of Pennsylvania’s current pro-life laws being struck down,and could result in legalizing abortion right up until birth, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Any future pro-life laws enacted to protect women’s health and preborn babies lives would likely be struck down under such a ruling. Current pro-life regulations in the Abortion Control Act, such as the 24-hour waiting period requirements, informed consent, and 24 week abortion limit would be in jeopardy of being repealed and ruled unconstitutional. The same is true with abortion clinic regulations put into place to protect women, passed into our law after the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors” scandal.
In addition to the lawsuit, the Abortion Industry is also trying the legislative route. House Bill 1888 would also create a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion in Pennsylvania’s constitution and remove our current pro-life protections.
The Lawsuit Status:
The Commonwealth Court ruled against the abortion industry in the Allegheny Reproductive v. Pennsylvania case on March 26, 2021. But the abortion industry appealed to the PA Supreme Court. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that there is no “fundamental right” to abortion, but three justices (Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht) overruled longstanding precedent that prohibited taxpayer funding of elective abortions. Justices Donohue and Wecht expressed interest in recognizing a right to abortion, while Justices Sally Mundy and Debra Todd dissented, with Mundy arguing the issue should be resolved by the political branches, not the courts. Justice Kevin Brobson abstained, and there was a vacancy on the court. The case was remanded to the Commonwealth Court, which heard oral arguments in February 2025. Governor Josh Shapiro’s administration had announced early on that they would not defend the law but would advocate for striking down the Medicaid funding ban.
Conclusion:
If the Abortion Industry gets their way, the PA Supreme Court ruling would force state taxpayer funding of abortions, strike down parental consent and 24 hour waiting period requirements, end health and safety regulations to protect women at abortion clinics, and worse. And any future legislation to protect women and babies would be found unconstitutional. Pennsylvania would join a list of states where lawsuits have already resulted in those state supreme courts “finding” a right to abortion in their constitutions, thereby striking down pro-life laws just like ours.

Related Articles
Penn State Falls Into a Pit
by Michael Geer, President The release of the Freeh Report today regarding the Penn State- Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal brought to mind words spoken at a Pennsylvania House Appropriations Committee hearing more than a decade ago. Those words, spoken by then-...
Don’t be Fooled! Federal Healthcare Law Upheld Today, Still Forces Americans to Pay for Abortions
by Tom Shaheen, Vice President, Pennsylvania Family Institute This is another INSIDE look at what the Supreme Court upheld today. It's STILL bad law! Make no mistake, despite the promises and empty claims of President Obama and defenders of the controversial...
Pennsylvania Family Institute Denounces Today’s ObamaCare Ruling
(Harrisburg, PA - June 28) - The Pennsylvania Family Institute finds today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court upholding the controversial federal healthcare law alarming and deeply wrong. The law is a threat to personal liberty, religious freedom and family...
Common Sense Comes to Pennsylvania
Never Again Can We Allow Another Gosnell Scandal to Take Place (Harrisburg,PA) This week, a long-overdue law, Act 122, takes effect to more properly and effectively regulate surgical abortion facilities. The act is aimed at ensuring that Pennsylvania never again...
Claiming the Right to Unhappiness: Aldous Huxley’s Warning from the Future
By Chris Wetzel, PFI Intern Like most prophets, Aldous Huxley is without honor in his own country. Eighty years ago, Huxley’s dystopian novel Brave New World warned of a future Britain where children are manufactured to precise specifications with fertilization done...
New Mexico Says “No” To Religious Liberty
By Eleanor Linton, PFI Intern With New Mexico’s Court of Appeals ruling on Tuesday June 5, religious liberties protected by the First Amendment took a severe blow. The Court upheld an opinion from the New Mexico Human Rights Commission that a photography company could...
Behind China on Human Rights: Barack Obama, “Gendercide,” and Eugenics
In a move that ought to (but likely won’t) outrage women’s rights advocates everywhere, President Obama announced today that he opposes proposed legislation that would ban gender-selective abortions. The president’s position defies commentary to the extent that it is...
Obama Leads Party to Defeat Gendercide Ban
From Lifenews.com: Democrats in the House of Representatives prevented passage of a bill that would ban sex-selection abortions. The legislation needed a two-thirds vote and Democrats voted overwhelmingly against the legislation after President Barack Obama and...