Issue
Keep Abortion Out of Pennsylvania’s Constitution
KEY POINTS
- A consortium of abortion clinics have sued Pennsylvania, arguing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should force taxpayers to fund abortion and to find (invent) a right to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
- A win for the abortion industry in this case would force taxpayer funding of abortion, and would likely establish a right to an abortion in Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
- If abortion is declared a constitutional right in Pennsylvania, all current and future pro-life regulations would be in jeopardy of being struck down
- The Pennsylvania State House passed HB1957 in December of 2025, a bill that would amend the Pennsylvania State Constitution to create a right to abortion on-demand until birth. It is expected to not be considered by Republican leadership in the Senate.
TAKE ACTION
Tell your legislators to OPPOSE HB1957
Act Now
The Threat
The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.
The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should declare a right to abortion and taxpayer-funded abortions in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
A win for the abortion industry in this case would not only force taxpayers to fund abortion, but a court-imposed state-constitutional “right to abortion” could lead to all of Pennsylvania’s current pro-life laws being struck down,and could result in legalizing abortion right up until birth, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Any future pro-life laws enacted to protect women’s health and preborn babies lives would likely be struck down under such a ruling. Current pro-life regulations in the Abortion Control Act, such as the 24-hour waiting period requirements, informed consent, and 24 week abortion limit would be in jeopardy of being repealed and ruled unconstitutional. The same is true with abortion clinic regulations put into place to protect women, passed into our law after the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors” scandal.
In addition to the lawsuit, the Abortion Industry is also trying the legislative route. House Bill 1957 would also create a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion in Pennsylvania’s constitution and remove our current pro-life protections.
The Lawsuit Status
The Commonwealth Court ruled against the abortion industry in the Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania case on March 26, 2021. The abortion industry appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which ruled that there is no “fundamental right” to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution. However, by a slim majority, the Court overturned a 40-year precedent that had prohibited taxpayer funding of elective abortions.
Three justices—Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht—overruled the longstanding precedent barring taxpayer-funded abortions. Justices Donohue and Wecht expressed interest in recognizing a constitutional right to abortion. Two justices—Sally Mundy and Debra Todd—dissented, with Justice Mundy arguing that the issue should be resolved by the political branches, not the courts. Justice Kevin Brobson abstained, and there was a vacancy on the court at the time.
The case was remanded back to the Commonwealth Court, which heard oral arguments again on November 5, 2025, in Pittsburgh. The case is expected to return to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for final resolution.
Conclusion
If the Abortion Industry gets their way, the PA Supreme Court ruling would force state taxpayer funding of abortions, strike down parental consent and 24 hour waiting period requirements, end health and safety regulations to protect women at abortion clinics, and worse. And any future legislation to protect women and babies would be found unconstitutional. Pennsylvania would join a list of states where lawsuits have already resulted in those state supreme courts “finding” a right to abortion in their constitutions, thereby striking down pro-life laws just like ours.
Related Articles
Texas Win Clears Path for Pennsylvania to Protect Kids Online
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered an important ruling in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, upholding Texas’ age-verification law for online pornography. This decision is a huge win for families across the nation, and for our ongoing efforts right here in...
Celebrating Life: Pro-Life Leaders, Pregnancy Centers, and Students Gather at Capitol for “Life Month”
Pro-life leaders, student advocates, and pregnancy resource center staff came together today at the Pennsylvania State Capitol to commemorate June as Life Month, recognizing the third anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s historic Dobbs decision overturning Roe v....
Lancaster Teen and Mother Charged—But the Root Issue Is the Abortion Industry’s Deception
A heartbreaking update has emerged in the tragic Lancaster County case we first reported—a teen and her mother have now been charged with concealing the death of a child after the teen took abortion pills at home, gave birth alone, and buried the baby’s body in their...
Harmful Uniform Parentage Act (HB 350) Places the Desires of Adults Over Children’s Well-being
UPDATE – June 16, 2025: HB 350 has now passed Second Consideration on the House floor, a critical step that allowed for proposed amendments but saw no meaningful changes to address the bill’s most dangerous provisions. A final vote on Third Consideration is expected...
Fatherhood Matters: Why Dads Are Essential for Families—and for Our Nation
Dads Are Essential for Families
Embracing Authentic Masculinity: A Call for Meekness in a Crisis of Manhood
At the Pennsylvania Family Institute, we are committed to fostering strong families and communities rooted in timeless values. This is why we’re excited to share insights from an article by Andrew Warthen, a former intern, graduate of Franciscan University of...
“Love is Love”?
You've seen and heard it everywhere—from bumper stickers, lawn signs and billboards to the mouths of celebrities and politicians: "Love is love." It sounds nice. Caring. Non-confrontational. But when you really stop and think about it, this phrase does a lot more than...
There’s Nothing “Family-Friendly” About the Fairness Act or Drag Shows in the Capitol.
A troubling event was scheduled to take place at the Pennsylvania State Capitol on Tuesday, June 3rd: a so-called “family-friendly drag show” hosted in support of the reintroduction of the Fairness Act. Although the event has now been postponed, the underlying agenda...








