Issue
Discrimination Against Religious Public School Teachers in PA
Update: The Religious Garb Bill, Senate Bill 84, has passed and been signed into law! Teachers in Pennsylvania are now free to wear religious symbols.

Pictured, L to R: Dan Bartkowiak, Director of Communications at PA Family; Jeremy Samek, Senior Counsel at the Independence Law Center; Sen. Judy Schwank; Sen. Kristin Phillips-Hill; Hank Butler of the Jewish Coalition; Eric Failing of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference; and Tom Shaheen, Vice President for Policy at PA Family.
Key Points:
Pennsylvania was the last state in the U.S. with a law that unconstitutionally discriminates against teachers’ wearing of any religious garb.
The old ban on religious garb for teachers was originally enacted in order to target Catholic teachers.
Public school teachers wearing religious garb does not violate the Establishment Clause. For example, a Jewish teacher may wear a yamaka, a Catholic nun may wear a habit, a Christian teacher may wear a cross, and a Sikh teacher may wear a dastaar.
The old Pennsylvania law (now thankfully updated) is both unconstitutional and constitutes illegal religious discrimination by allowing teachers to wear all manner of secular symbols while banning the wearing of religious garb or symbolism.
S.B.84 passed and repealed this law and now protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools.
The Issue
Before SB 84, Pennsylvania law banned teachers, on penalty of a one-year suspension for a first violation and firing for a second offense, from wearing any type of religious garb, mark, emblem, or insignia indicating a teacher is a member of any religion.
The law prior to SB 84 stated:
Religious Garb, Insignia, etc., Prohibited; Penalty
(a) That no teacher in any public school shall wear in said school or while engaged in the performance of his duty as such teacher any dress, mark, emblem or insignia indicating the fact that such teacher is a member or adherent of any religious order, sect or denomination.
(b) Any teacher employed in any of the public schools of this Commonwealth, who violates the provisions of this section, shall be suspended from employment in such school for the term of one year, and in case of a second offense by the same teacher he shall be permanently disqualified from teaching in said school….
Pennsylvania was the very last state in our country to still have one of these antiquated prohibitions, which were promoted by the Ku Klux Klan due to its anti-Catholic sentiments. It was long overdue for Pennsylvania to remove this archaic, discriminatory, and anti-religious law from our Public School Code in order to protect religious teachers from unjust discrimination.
In 1908, a Mennonite teacher was fired from her public school job for wearing a head covering, and the Pennsylvania state court upheld the law. But in 2003, after a public school suspended an instructional assistant for wearing a cross necklace, Judge Arthur Schwab ruled in Nichol v. Arin Intermediate Unit 28 that the statute did not apply to the instructional assistant because she was employed by an intermediate unit rather than the school itself, and as such was not a teacher as defined in the statute. However, the ruling indicated the statute was likely unconstitutional if applied to teachers.
The Solution
Though some schools have stopped enforcing this law, the legislature put and end to it once and for all by passing SB 84. Now teachers in Pennsylvania won’t be put situations where they must choose to avoid the teaching profession because of the existence of this law, to avoid situations where their rights are chilled, or have to avoid situations where a school attempts to enforce this discriminatory and unconstitutional law, resulting in liability for the government.
S.B.84 repealed this law and protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools. According to a memo from the Prime Sponsor, Senator Phillips-Hill (R-York), “The senators’ proposal would eliminate a section from the state’s Education Code that prohibits a teacher from wearing any dress, mark emblem, or insignia indicative of his or her faith or denomination.”
“A teacher should not be worried about his or her job for simply wearing a cross on a necklace. Our First Amendment rights do not end simply because a teacher walks into a classroom,” Phillips-Hill said. “The Senate Education committee took an important step to protect our First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of religious expression.”

Related Articles
Update on Bathroom Bills: “In my 27 years here, I’ve never seen such extreme special-interest pressure.”
From Michael Geer, President of the Pennsylvania Family Council: It’s vitally important that I update you on expected actions at the State Capitol this week – actions that could significantly affect you and your family, your future and your freedom. The Pennsylvania...
Want a Ride to the Defend My Privacy Rally on June 27th?
Do you want to attend the Defend My Privacy Rally on Monday, June 27th at the Capitol, but you don't want to drive to Harrisburg? We have buses available from several different locations around the state: Lancaster Reading Millersburg Gibsonia Monroeville Washington,...
Temporary Victory on PA Bathroom Bills in House and Senate
IN THE SENATE: Thank you to everyone who contacted their State Senator regarding SB 1306, SB 1307 and SB 974. Because of the amount of phone calls received and the important concerns you shared with your senators, the committee vote that was scheduled for Wednesday...
Keep it Up! Contact your State Senator to Vote NO on the Bathroom Bills
GOOD WORK to those who have reached out to their State Senator regarding the Bathroom Bills (SB 1306, SB 1307, and SB 974). Phones over at the State Senate are ringing off the hook! But, the work is not over yet. Some Senators still misunderstand the implications of...
BREAKING NEWS: Why you MUST CALL & EMAIL your State Senator and State Representative by Tuesday
NEW DEVELOPMENTS ON THE BATHROOM BILLS, ACTION EXPECTED IN BOTH HOUSE & SENATE. IN THE SENATE: A handful of State Senate Republicans are looking to advance Gov. Tom Wolf’s top policy agenda (SB 974), which would have serious implications for personal privacy and...
Representative Frankel: You’re Wrong About HB1510 – PA’s Bathroom Bill
State Representative Dan Frankel is the lead PA House sponsor of Pennsylvania's Bathroom Bill - HB1510 - and he's made some erroneous statements about the bill that we'd like to respond to: FALSE: "Religious freedom would remain protected under both HB1510/SB974 AND...
Pray on Sunday, Call on Monday – All Throughout June
Prayer & Action - Every Sunday & Monday in the month of June Bulletin inserts available: Color - Pray on Sunday. Call on Monday. Bulletin Insert Black and White - Pray on Sunday. Call on Monday. Bulletin Insert Pennsylvania is facing one of its greatest...
How PA School Boards Can Protect Privacy Rights
The Obama administration made a “directive” to public schools that they are to open up women’s locker rooms and restrooms to the opposite sex. It is not an executive order. It is not an administrative regulation. This has no force of law or legal authority behind it,...

Videos
Analysis of Bostock Ruling
Conversation with Carl Trueman and Andrew Walker
Protecting Privacy and Religious Freedom – An American Ideal