Issue
Standards for Explicit Sexual Content in Schools
KEY POINTS
- School Boards are legally permitted to create policy setting standards for preventing age-inappropriate sexually explicit content in their curriculum and library.
- The standard ought not be: “As long as this book doesn’t land us in jail for giving it to a minor, the sexually explicit content is welcome in our curriculum or the school library.”
- Written policy protects students, parents, employees, and the school
and ensures better educational content will fill the finite space in curriculum and in libraries. - Schools should prioritize material that provides rich educational value over material that may provide similar value but also has age-inappropriate sexually explicit content.
- Age-Appropriate policies are not directed at viewpoint and are not banning the book from student possession. They are exercising the schools prerogative to determine what to include in its own library and curriculum.
Standards for Sexually Explicit Content in Schools
Schools must engage in line-drawing for age appropriateness of sexually explicit content in their library and curriculum. Criminal laws are one required line prohibiting schools from giving materials to minors in curriculum or library that a court deems pornographic or obscene. But what about sexually explicit content that does not rise to the extremely high bar of criminal law?
School boards are legally permitted to articulate standards that go beyond “would we land in jail for giving this book to a minor?” to prevent other age-inappropriate sexually explicit content in their curriculum and school library. Unfortunately, many schools have no policy standards for sexually explicit material beyond criminal law.
Schools with written age-appropriate standards for sexually explicit materials that differ for elementary, middle, and high schools protect students and ensures better educational content will fill the finite space in curriculum and in libraries.
But such written policies also protect the school’s staff and district from costly litigation. Even without written policy, a school librarian, principal, or school board is permitted to remove a particular title they deem age-inappropriate sexually explicit material. But with written policy standards, the school is less susceptible to baseless allegations that the title was removed for an impermissible viewpoint discriminatory reason.
School employees still have wide discretion to select and purchase books that comport with the age-appropriate standards in written policy set by the school board, and from that universe of materials, parents then have ultimate authority to make additional age-appropriate determinations for their own child and should have authority to restrict certain titles for their own child.
Individuals who desire to see sexually explicit materials in the hands of minors sometimes argue that such policies are “book bans.” Attempts at labeling common-sense school standards as “book bans” have been rejected by courts, most recently in August of 2022 by a federal court in Missouri.
A parent, for example, who wants to buy sexually explicit books for their own child to read are not prevented from doing so by such school policies. School policies setting forth its own age-appropriate standards for sexually explicit content in its own curriculum and school library do not even prohibit a student from bringing their own book to school or from reading it in an appropriate time, such as study hall. But school districts do not have to put such explicit books in their own curriculum or in the school library, and such a decision by the school is not a ban on books.
Such policies treat inappropriate sexually explicit content the same regardless of whether the sexually explicit depictions or descriptions happen to be between straight, gay, or even a lone person. As such the argument made by those who desire to see sexually explicit materials in the hands of minors, that these policies are directed at LGBT people, is false.
Too many schools lack baseline standards regarding sexually explicit content in school libraries. Schools ought to spend the finite time in the day on academic excellence, and sexually explicit content detracts from that. Explicit sexual depictions and descriptions may sell, but refusal to purchase it is no ban. Districts can decide not to buy and stock sexually explicit content. If you are a school board member who desires to implement such a policy, we are glad to assist you.

Related Articles
Save $25 – Register Your Teen Early for City on the Hill!
City on the Hill Youth Leadership Conference July 21 - 27, 2013 Early Registration Discount: Save $25 if you apply by May 28. Open to all High School students (age 15-18). To apply, register online at www.pafamily.org/application.php. Click here to watch a video recap...
Dr. Ben Carson coming to Hershey in September
Pennsylvania Family Institute is excited to announce our Friends of the Family Banquet with special guest, Dr. Ben Carson Saturday, September 7, 2013, at 6:30 p.m. The Hershey Lodge Sponsorships now available Click here for more details. Dr. Ben Carson is an...
Boy Scouts on the Brink
Tomorrow, 1400 delegates will vote to decide the future of scouting in America. Read this from Dr. Al Mohler for a thorough explanation of what's happened and what's at stake. Then join thousands of others in prayer for wisdom and discernment for the vote. Meeting...
Congress putting activism ahead of children in need of families
Alert from our friends at Family Research Council: Under new legislation, the government would punish any adoption agency that gives priority to married, heterosexual couples. The bill, co-sponsored by Reps. John Lewis (D-Ga.) and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), would...
City on the Hill – “It changed my world.”
Over the last 12 summers, the staff of Pennsylvania Family Institute has had the privilege of bringing 500 high school students through our City on the Hill experience. City on the Hill is our annual youth leadership and worldview conference, coming up this summer...
No taxdollars for abortions – possible vote on Tuesday
House Bill 818 would ensure that abortion will not be covered under the health care exchanges. This would maintain the status quo - preserving current Pennsylvania policy regarding public funding of abortions. HB 818 could come before the full House for a vote as...
#Gosnell – The Whole Story
Breaking the Media Silence: The Whole Gosnell Story With the prolonged silence in the media on the trial of abortionist Kermit Gosnell, there is a lack of information available about what really happened. We need to break the silence. We need to educate ourselves with...
Abortion Funding Opt-Out for PA Passes Committee
Pennsylvania took a step in the right direction today in passing SB 3 out of committee today by a 8-5 vote. SB 3 would ensure that abortion will not be covered under the health care exchanges (Obamacare). This would maintain the status quo - preserving current...
