Issue
Parental Rights Curriculum Transparency
KEY POINTS
Informed parents and guardians drastically improve educational outcomes, and educational transparency benefits students, parents, guardians, teachers, and administrators alike.
Transparency deters or exposes those who wish to use their government positions to coerce and indoctrinate students with political, social, and sexual ideologies.
School Boards should update their Parental Review Policies to provide digital access to instructional materials, and to require that any additional supplemental material a teacher gives to children that was not part of approved curriculum is placed in a digital folder accessible to parents for review.
Informed parents and guardians drastically improve educational outcomes. Transparency in education benefits students, parents and guardians, teachers, administrators, and in the end, society. Transparency also deters or exposes those who wish to use their government positions to coerce and indoctrinate students with political, social, and sexual ideologies. Even involved parents have been disturbed to discover activist, ideological, and outright sexually explicit material being taught to their children, without their knowledge or consent.
Parental Rights to Review Materials in Existing Law
Pennsylvania and Federal law requires schools to give parents the opportunity to review all instructional materials and have access to information about the curriculum, including academic standards to be achieved, teacher manuals, films, tapes, supplemental instructional materials, evaluations and assessment techniques. 20 U.S. Code §1232h and 22 Pa Code §4.4. Your local Pennsylvania public school has policies regarding parental rights to review materials. These policies are often found on their website and usually begin at Board Policy 105.
Two Problems with the Status Quo
First, many public schools make it extremely difficult to review materials. There are waiting periods, in person review requirements, and requirements that an employee be taken away from their usual tasks in order to watch a parent review material, among other unnecessarily burdensome limits.
The Pennsylvania legislature passed the Educational Transparency Act in 2021, which would have required that a portion of the materials that parents are entitled to review would be accessible on the district’s website. Parents who don’t have time to go to the school to sit and read would have been able to review the material from their homes. Furthermore, schools would no longer have had to use its employee hours pulling together information and sitting and watching the parents read the materials. Governor Wolf vetoed this common-sense legislation.
The second problem, which the vetoed state legislation did not even address, is that even when all of the hoops are jumped through, a good portion of what is placed before your child WILL NOT BE GIVEN TO YOU to review. This is because teachers often use materials that are not part of curriculum or any approved supplemental materials. Current events, such as the war in Ukraine, may necessitate for instance, that a history teacher assign an article or watch a video about the current event. But this material, or links to internet-based content, is important for parents to be able to review. Yet it is often difficult for parents, board members, and even administrators to know this material even exists. And the opportunity for abuse is unlimited.
School Boards should update their parental review policies to provide digital access to instructional materials, and to require that any additional supplemental material a teacher gives to children which was not part of approved curriculum is immediately placed in a digital folder accessible to parents and administrators for review. If you are a school board member who desires to implement such a policy, we are glad to assist you.

Related Articles
Is it fair to force a school to open girls restrooms to male students?
Many of the concerns with the “Fairness Act”—the proposal that would add “sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression” to Pennsylvania's non-discrimination law—may not hit very close to home to a lot of people. After all, only so many Pennsylvanians own...
Oct. 30: Two Outspoken Christian Leaders Come to Hershey
2015 Friends of the Family Banquet Our Wilberforce Moment Featuring Eric Metaxas with special guest Chief Kelvin Cochran Friday October 30th | Hershey Lodge Dinner Tickets Available: www.DinnerwiththeFamily.org Eric Metaxas is "a photogenic, witty ambassador for...
Threat to Christian Schools is Real
Statements by a State Senator provide clear evidence that Pennsylvania Christian schools are at risk should SB 974 (the so-called "Fairness Act") become law. At issue: What happens when a Christian school dismisses a teacher for engaging in a public act contrary to...
“Today, it’s the baker; tomorrow, it’s the pastor.” Exclusive Interview with NYT Best-Selling Author Dr. Paul Kengor
The following Q&A is an exclusive interview with Professor Paul Kengor on his new book, Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage, and his views of the recent Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage. Interview...
Protect Your Freedom – Resources for your church, ministry, business and school.
The Supreme Court’s decision to redefine marriage has staggering implications for religious freedom, and the ability for individuals, for-profit businesses, non-profit businesses, religious schools and ministries to freely operate in accordance with their faith...
Pro-Life & Pro-Marriage: Connecting Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges
The Supreme Court's decision to redefine marriage may be the most destructive ruling since Roe v. Wade - dividing our nation and setting the stage for future attacks on the family. For Roe v. Wade and now Obergefell v. Hodges, there is a connection between the two -...
9 Ways Redefining Marriage Impacts Your World
This list courtesy of Focus on the Family. With the Supreme Court ruling to redefine marriage, we will continue to see religious freedom taking a back seat to sexual freedom in many facets of society: Harms Children: Redefining marriage denies children of same-sex...
PA newspaper BANS letters/op-eds supporting marriage between husband/wife
By: Dan Bartkowiak Five Supreme Court Justices - five people - have redefined marriage for an entire nation. Justice Roberts wrote in his dissent that: Today’s decision, for example, creates serious questions about religious liberty. Many good and decent people oppose...
