Issue
Keep Abortion Out of Pennsylvania’s Constitution
KEY POINTS
- A consortium of abortion clinics have sued Pennsylvania, arguing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should force taxpayers to fund abortion and to find (invent) a right to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
- A win for the abortion industry in this case would force taxpayer funding of abortion, and would likely establish a right to an abortion in Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
- If abortion is declared a constitutional right in Pennsylvania, all current and future pro-life regulations would be in jeopardy of being struck down
- The Pennsylvania State House passed HB1957 in December of 2025, a bill that would amend the Pennsylvania State Constitution to create a right to abortion on-demand until birth. It is expected to not be considered by Republican leadership in the Senate.
TAKE ACTION
Tell your legislators to OPPOSE HB1957
Act Now
The Threat
The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.
The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should declare a right to abortion and taxpayer-funded abortions in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
A win for the abortion industry in this case would not only force taxpayers to fund abortion, but a court-imposed state-constitutional “right to abortion” could lead to all of Pennsylvania’s current pro-life laws being struck down,and could result in legalizing abortion right up until birth, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Any future pro-life laws enacted to protect women’s health and preborn babies lives would likely be struck down under such a ruling. Current pro-life regulations in the Abortion Control Act, such as the 24-hour waiting period requirements, informed consent, and 24 week abortion limit would be in jeopardy of being repealed and ruled unconstitutional. The same is true with abortion clinic regulations put into place to protect women, passed into our law after the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors” scandal.
In addition to the lawsuit, the Abortion Industry is also trying the legislative route. House Bill 1957 would also create a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion in Pennsylvania’s constitution and remove our current pro-life protections.
The Lawsuit Status
The Commonwealth Court ruled against the abortion industry in the Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania case on March 26, 2021. The abortion industry appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which ruled that there is no “fundamental right” to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution. However, by a slim majority, the Court overturned a 40-year precedent that had prohibited taxpayer funding of elective abortions.
Three justices—Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht—overruled the longstanding precedent barring taxpayer-funded abortions. Justices Donohue and Wecht expressed interest in recognizing a constitutional right to abortion. Two justices—Sally Mundy and Debra Todd—dissented, with Justice Mundy arguing that the issue should be resolved by the political branches, not the courts. Justice Kevin Brobson abstained, and there was a vacancy on the court at the time.
The case was remanded back to the Commonwealth Court, which heard oral arguments again on November 5, 2025, in Pittsburgh. The case is expected to return to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for final resolution.
Conclusion
If the Abortion Industry gets their way, the PA Supreme Court ruling would force state taxpayer funding of abortions, strike down parental consent and 24 hour waiting period requirements, end health and safety regulations to protect women at abortion clinics, and worse. And any future legislation to protect women and babies would be found unconstitutional. Pennsylvania would join a list of states where lawsuits have already resulted in those state supreme courts “finding” a right to abortion in their constitutions, thereby striking down pro-life laws just like ours.
Related Articles
Immediate Action Needed on Assault to Religious Freedom
Congress has the opportunity to restore religious liberty and protect conscience for all Americans by including conscience protections in any must-pass legislation. The Obama administration has made it clear that it will continue to violate conscience with the HHS...
Gambling Addiction: Coming Home to Roost
My good friend, and former Pa State Legislator Jeff Coleman today shared an article on Facebook from the Pittsburgh Post Gazette on the damage caused by gambling addiction. When Jeff was in the legislature, he was a strong and strategic ally to those of us on the...
Sex Tutorial in PA College Chapel
by Brandon McGinley The conservative college news website The College Fix, in an article by Allegheny College student Katie McHugh, brings word of a sexually graphic event hosted in that school's Ford Memorial Chapel in Meadville, PA. (See link and disclaimer...
Head Start ends up being a false start
From Pittsburgh Tribune-Review: Head Start, the federal program for pre-kindergarten children from low-income families, costs taxpayers $8 billion each year. Congress asked the Department of Health and Human Services to conduct a study of the program's effectiveness,...
Myth Busters: ‘Victims’ of marriage laws?
by Tom Shaheen, PA Family Institute Those of us who care about marriage await the U.S. Supreme Court's consideration of the "gay marriage" challenge to California's Proposition 8, where a majority of citizens of all political stripes approved of keeping marriage...
President Denies Freedom of Religion
Wednesday, January 16th was Freedom of Religion Day. To mark the occasion, President Obama released a proclamation - click here to read it. Unfortunately, he missed the mark. And his words and the actions of his administration show clearly that he does not truly...
Hundreds of Thousands of Frenchmen Protest Same-Sex ‘Marriage’
Good news, from France! From Bloomberg.com: Protests against French President Francois Hollande’s proposal to allow same-sex marriage drew hundreds of thousands of people into the streets in Paris. Read more...
Think Planned Parenthood is “good” enough for taxyaper funding? Think again!
by Tom Shaheen, Pennsylvania Family Institute Yesterday, Planned Parenthood released its 2011-2012 annual report. Here are just three stats from that report, as analyzed by our friends at SBA-list.org Still think that Planned Parenthood is a "health" organization or...
