Issue
Keep Abortion Out of Pennsylvania’s Constitution
KEY POINTS
- A consortium of abortion clinics have sued Pennsylvania, arguing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should force taxpayers to fund abortion and to find (invent) a right to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
- A win for the abortion industry in this case would force taxpayer funding of abortion, and would likely establish a right to an abortion in Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
- If abortion is declared a constitutional right in Pennsylvania, all current and future pro-life regulations would be in jeopardy of being struck down
- The Pennsylvania State House passed HB1957 in December of 2025, a bill that would amend the Pennsylvania State Constitution to create a right to abortion on-demand until birth. It is expected to not be considered by Republican leadership in the Senate.
TAKE ACTION
Tell your legislators to OPPOSE HB1957
Act Now
The Threat
The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.
The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should declare a right to abortion and taxpayer-funded abortions in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
A win for the abortion industry in this case would not only force taxpayers to fund abortion, but a court-imposed state-constitutional “right to abortion” could lead to all of Pennsylvania’s current pro-life laws being struck down,and could result in legalizing abortion right up until birth, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Any future pro-life laws enacted to protect women’s health and preborn babies lives would likely be struck down under such a ruling. Current pro-life regulations in the Abortion Control Act, such as the 24-hour waiting period requirements, informed consent, and 24 week abortion limit would be in jeopardy of being repealed and ruled unconstitutional. The same is true with abortion clinic regulations put into place to protect women, passed into our law after the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors” scandal.
In addition to the lawsuit, the Abortion Industry is also trying the legislative route. House Bill 1957 would also create a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion in Pennsylvania’s constitution and remove our current pro-life protections.
The Lawsuit Status
The Commonwealth Court ruled against the abortion industry in the Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania case on March 26, 2021. The abortion industry appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which ruled that there is no “fundamental right” to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution. However, by a slim majority, the Court overturned a 40-year precedent that had prohibited taxpayer funding of elective abortions.
Three justices—Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht—overruled the longstanding precedent barring taxpayer-funded abortions. Justices Donohue and Wecht expressed interest in recognizing a constitutional right to abortion. Two justices—Sally Mundy and Debra Todd—dissented, with Justice Mundy arguing that the issue should be resolved by the political branches, not the courts. Justice Kevin Brobson abstained, and there was a vacancy on the court at the time.
The case was remanded back to the Commonwealth Court, which heard oral arguments again on November 5, 2025, in Pittsburgh. The case is expected to return to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for final resolution.
Conclusion
If the Abortion Industry gets their way, the PA Supreme Court ruling would force state taxpayer funding of abortions, strike down parental consent and 24 hour waiting period requirements, end health and safety regulations to protect women at abortion clinics, and worse. And any future legislation to protect women and babies would be found unconstitutional. Pennsylvania would join a list of states where lawsuits have already resulted in those state supreme courts “finding” a right to abortion in their constitutions, thereby striking down pro-life laws just like ours.
Related Articles
Planned Parenthood’s Formula for Sex Education
Warning: linked content is not suitable for children. Thousands of young people - starting as early as age 6 - are taught sex-ed by Planned Parenthood every year.¹ This education could be summed up by the following: Porn x (50 Shades of Grey + Abortion) = Sex-Ed by...
Fatherhood Affirmed in Super Bowl Ads
It's encouraging to see fatherhood being affirmed and appreciated in this year's Super Bowl ads. Hopefully this shows we're moving away from the comic renditions of dumb and disconnected Dads to highlighting the important influence a father has on their family. Well...
Four Bills to Watch This Session
One of our event banners describes us well: "We're watching your state capitol." Today - January 20th - is the first day of the 2015-2016 legislative session. And we're already on the Hill, in the halls of power, fulfilling our partnership with YOU to protect the...
Press Release: Victory for the King’s Men, First Amendment Freedoms
(Philadelphia, PA) January 12, 2015 - The Independence Law Center went to court today and came out victorious on behalf of The King's Men, an organization that was sued by a sex-oriented business. Members of The King’s Men (thekingsmen.org) are a presence outside of...
Why These Courageous Men Are In Court
UPDATE: Federal court in Philadelphia ruled on 1/12/15 in our favor: the "adult" business agreed to have all charges they brought against The King's Men dismissed! Full story: pafamily.org/2015/01/victory-courageous-men-win-court-case Randall Wenger - our Chief...
12 Days of Christmas Contest Winners
Thank you to everyone who entered the PA Family Institute's "12 Days of Christmas" contest. We're happy to announce all of our winners: Book: Building a Strong Spiritual Family - Dennis & Barbara Rainey Alan W. - Lebanon Maryann J. - Perkasie Alfred M. - Lebanon...
What this 100-year-old Math Teacher Thinks About Common Core
This is what 100-year-old Elementary school math teacher Madeline Scotto thinks about Common Core: "How would you teach them 4 + 4? She told me you add this and subtract this and....THEY'RE MAKING IT MORE COMPLICATED as far as I'm concerned." "4 and 4....
12 Days of Christmas Contest
Win a signed book by Dr. Ben Carson or Dr. James Dobson! Pennsylvania Family Institute presents: The 12 Days of Christmas Contest Would you like an extra gift this Christmas season? To help celebrate Christmas and aligning with our mission to strengthen families,...



