Issue
Discrimination Against Religious Public School Teachers in PA
Update: The Religious Garb Bill, Senate Bill 84, has passed and been signed into law! Teachers in Pennsylvania are now free to wear religious symbols.

Pictured, L to R: Dan Bartkowiak, Director of Communications at PA Family; Jeremy Samek, Senior Counsel at the Independence Law Center; Sen. Judy Schwank; Sen. Kristin Phillips-Hill; Hank Butler of the Jewish Coalition; Eric Failing of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference; and Tom Shaheen, Vice President for Policy at PA Family.
Key Points:
Pennsylvania was the last state in the U.S. with a law that unconstitutionally discriminates against teachers’ wearing of any religious garb.
The old ban on religious garb for teachers was originally enacted in order to target Catholic teachers.
Public school teachers wearing religious garb does not violate the Establishment Clause. For example, a Jewish teacher may wear a yamaka, a Catholic nun may wear a habit, a Christian teacher may wear a cross, and a Sikh teacher may wear a dastaar.
The old Pennsylvania law (now thankfully updated) is both unconstitutional and constitutes illegal religious discrimination by allowing teachers to wear all manner of secular symbols while banning the wearing of religious garb or symbolism.
S.B.84 passed and repealed this law and now protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools.
The Issue
Before SB 84, Pennsylvania law banned teachers, on penalty of a one-year suspension for a first violation and firing for a second offense, from wearing any type of religious garb, mark, emblem, or insignia indicating a teacher is a member of any religion.
The law prior to SB 84 stated:
Religious Garb, Insignia, etc., Prohibited; Penalty
(a) That no teacher in any public school shall wear in said school or while engaged in the performance of his duty as such teacher any dress, mark, emblem or insignia indicating the fact that such teacher is a member or adherent of any religious order, sect or denomination.
(b) Any teacher employed in any of the public schools of this Commonwealth, who violates the provisions of this section, shall be suspended from employment in such school for the term of one year, and in case of a second offense by the same teacher he shall be permanently disqualified from teaching in said school….
Pennsylvania was the very last state in our country to still have one of these antiquated prohibitions, which were promoted by the Ku Klux Klan due to its anti-Catholic sentiments. It was long overdue for Pennsylvania to remove this archaic, discriminatory, and anti-religious law from our Public School Code in order to protect religious teachers from unjust discrimination.
In 1908, a Mennonite teacher was fired from her public school job for wearing a head covering, and the Pennsylvania state court upheld the law. But in 2003, after a public school suspended an instructional assistant for wearing a cross necklace, Judge Arthur Schwab ruled in Nichol v. Arin Intermediate Unit 28 that the statute did not apply to the instructional assistant because she was employed by an intermediate unit rather than the school itself, and as such was not a teacher as defined in the statute. However, the ruling indicated the statute was likely unconstitutional if applied to teachers.
The Solution
Though some schools have stopped enforcing this law, the legislature put and end to it once and for all by passing SB 84. Now teachers in Pennsylvania won’t be put situations where they must choose to avoid the teaching profession because of the existence of this law, to avoid situations where their rights are chilled, or have to avoid situations where a school attempts to enforce this discriminatory and unconstitutional law, resulting in liability for the government.
S.B.84 repealed this law and protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools. According to a memo from the Prime Sponsor, Senator Phillips-Hill (R-York), “The senators’ proposal would eliminate a section from the state’s Education Code that prohibits a teacher from wearing any dress, mark emblem, or insignia indicative of his or her faith or denomination.”
“A teacher should not be worried about his or her job for simply wearing a cross on a necklace. Our First Amendment rights do not end simply because a teacher walks into a classroom,” Phillips-Hill said. “The Senate Education committee took an important step to protect our First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of religious expression.”

Related Articles
Order Your 2010 Voters’ Guides!
This year's Voters' Guide will contain non-partisan information about candidates for Pennsylvania Governor and United States Senate - two of the most-watched races in the nation. Plus, there will be information on US House and races right down to State House and...
Marriage and Democracy – Victims of Judge’s Decision in California Case
August 5, 2010 For Immediate Release Marriage and Democracy Both Victims of Federal Judge’s Decision in California Case Harrisburg, Pa. In a stunning act of judicial activism at its worst, U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker struck down as unconstitutional California’s...
A Supreme Blunder
In a split 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the University of California’s Hastings College of the Law could legally remove official recognition to a Christian organization called the Christian Legal Society because of its prohibition of gays...
School Superintendent to Parents: Get Lost!
Provincetown, MA elementary school to offer condoms to 1-6 graders, and parents have NO SAY. Watch this CNN story for details. http://bit.ly/bEQS6o This brave new world will arrive in PA if HB 1163 becomes law. Take at stand!
Why would PA lawmakers want to mandate failed sex-ed here?
From Dr. New: “Starting in 1999, the British government launched its Teenage Pregnancy Strategy program whose goal was to cut the number of teen pregnancies in half by promoting comprehensive sexual education and birth control. Since 1999, some £300 million ($454 million in U.S. dollars) was spent on this initiative
Unfortunately, the British teen-abortion rate, has climbed steadily since then. In fact, in 2009, the London Daily Mail reported that teen-pregnancy rates in England are now higher than they were in 1995 and pregnancies among girls under 16, below the age of sexual consent, are also at the highest level since 1998.”
Sacred Fire Author to speak at City On The Hill
I'm excited to announce we just confirmed Dr. Peter Lillback and Dr. Paul Kengor to speak at our City On The Hill Youth Leadership and Worldview Conference, July 25-31. Dr. Lillback is author of the Amazon #1 book, George Washington's Sacred Fire and is president of...
The Postman Brings Word of Victory
I think you’ll be happy with this news about our efforts and our successes on your behalf – in support of religious liberty and family values. Earlier today, we hosted one of our “State Street Briefings” – a luncheon series for lawmakers, Capitol staffers, attorneys...
The Truth Project in Manheim
More than 130 attended our Truth Project leader training seminar Saturday in Manheim, including some from New York state and Delaware. We're approaching nearly 1,000 leaders trained here in Pennsylvania; I can't wait to see the transformation that will take place over...

Videos
Analysis of Bostock Ruling
Conversation with Carl Trueman and Andrew Walker
Protecting Privacy and Religious Freedom – An American Ideal