Issue


Discrimination Against Religious Public School Teachers in PA

Update: The Religious Garb Bill, Senate Bill 84, has passed and been signed into law! Teachers in Pennsylvania are now free to wear religious symbols. 

Pictured, L to R: Dan Bartkowiak, Director of Communications at PA Family; Jeremy Samek, Senior Counsel at the Independence Law Center; Sen. Judy Schwank; Sen. Kristin Phillips-Hill; Hank Butler of the Jewish Coalition; Eric Failing of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference; and Tom Shaheen, Vice President for  Policy at PA Family.

Key Points:

Pennsylvania was the last state in the U.S. with a law that unconstitutionally discriminates against teachers’ wearing of any religious garb.

The old ban on religious garb for teachers was originally enacted in order to target Catholic teachers.

Public school teachers wearing religious garb does not violate the Establishment Clause. For example, a Jewish teacher may wear a yamaka, a Catholic nun may wear a habit, a Christian teacher may wear a cross, and a Sikh teacher may wear a dastaar.

The old Pennsylvania law (now thankfully updated) is both unconstitutional and constitutes illegal religious discrimination by allowing teachers to wear all manner of secular symbols while banning the wearing of religious garb or symbolism.

S.B.84 passed and repealed this law and now protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools.

The Issue 

Before SB 84, Pennsylvania law banned teachers, on penalty of a one-year suspension for a first violation and firing for a second offense, from wearing any type of religious garb, mark, emblem, or insignia indicating a teacher is a member of any religion.

The law prior to SB 84 stated:

Religious Garb, Insignia, etc., Prohibited; Penalty

(a) That no teacher in any public school shall wear in said school or while engaged in the performance of his duty as such teacher any dress, mark, emblem or insignia indicating the fact that such teacher is a member or adherent of any religious order, sect or denomination.

(b) Any teacher employed in any of the public schools of this Commonwealth, who violates the provisions of this section, shall be suspended from employment in such school for the term of one year, and in case of a second offense by the same teacher he shall be permanently disqualified from teaching in said school….

24 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 11-1112.

Pennsylvania was the very last state in our country to still have one of these antiquated prohibitions, which were promoted by the Ku Klux Klan due to its anti-Catholic sentiments. It was long overdue for Pennsylvania to remove this archaic, discriminatory, and anti-religious law from our Public School Code in order to protect religious teachers from unjust discrimination.

In 1908, a Mennonite teacher was fired from her public school job for wearing a head covering, and the Pennsylvania state court upheld the law. But in 2003, after a public school suspended an instructional assistant for wearing a cross necklace, Judge Arthur Schwab ruled in Nichol v. Arin Intermediate Unit 28 that the statute did not apply to the instructional assistant because she was employed by an intermediate unit rather than the school itself, and as such was not a teacher as defined in the statute. However, the ruling indicated the statute was likely unconstitutional if applied to teachers.

The Solution

Though some schools have stopped enforcing this law, the legislature put and end to it once and for all by passing SB 84. Now teachers in Pennsylvania won’t be put situations where they must choose to avoid the teaching profession because of the existence of this law, to avoid situations where their rights are chilled, or have to avoid situations where a school attempts to enforce this discriminatory and unconstitutional law, resulting in liability for the government. 

S.B.84 repealed this law and protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools. According to a memo from the Prime Sponsor, Senator Phillips-Hill (R-York), “The senators’ proposal would eliminate a section from the state’s Education Code that prohibits a teacher from wearing any dress, mark emblem, or insignia indicative of his or her faith or denomination.”

“A teacher should not be worried about his or her job for simply wearing a cross on a necklace. Our First Amendment rights do not end simply because a teacher walks into a classroom,” Phillips-Hill said. “The Senate Education committee took an important step to protect our First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of religious expression.”

Related Articles

Video Clip of PFI Chief Counsel on Fox&Friends

Our own Randy Wenger, chief counsel of our Independence Law Center, appeared Saturday morning in the 8 a.m. hour of FOX & Friends on the FOX News Channel. Randy appeared along with his client, Sharon Prudhomme, long-time owner of a Columbia, PA restaurant that is...

read more

Our Rights Come from God, Not Government

An Independence Day Reminder In the best known lines of our Declaration of Independence, are found the words: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among...

read more

Religious Freedom Threatened by Government Policies

Op-ed by Jennifer Marshall of the Heritage Foundation: Americans enjoy the freedom not only to worship according to the dictates of conscience but also to express and to live according to those beliefs as we engage in public life. Such a blessing is extraordinarily...

read more

New Legislation Helps Kids, Helps Families

by Dan Bartkowiak "2...4...6...8...who do we appreciate!?!" Answer: Any elected offical supporting HB 2468. For kids, summer means vacation from school. For PFI, summer means we have the opportunity to award families with our EITC scholarships for the next school...

read more

New Mexico Says “No” To Religious Liberty

By Eleanor Linton, PFI Intern With New Mexico’s Court of Appeals ruling on Tuesday June 5, religious liberties protected by the First Amendment took a severe blow. The Court upheld an opinion from the New Mexico Human Rights Commission that a photography company could...

read more

Videos

Analysis of Bostock Ruling

Conversation with Carl Trueman and Andrew Walker

Protecting Privacy and Religious Freedom – An American Ideal