Issue
Discrimination Against Religious Public School Teachers in PA
Update: The Religious Garb Bill, Senate Bill 84, has passed and been signed into law! Teachers in Pennsylvania are now free to wear religious symbols.

Pictured, L to R: Dan Bartkowiak, Director of Communications at PA Family; Jeremy Samek, Senior Counsel at the Independence Law Center; Sen. Judy Schwank; Sen. Kristin Phillips-Hill; Hank Butler of the Jewish Coalition; Eric Failing of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference; and Tom Shaheen, Vice President for Policy at PA Family.
Key Points:
Pennsylvania was the last state in the U.S. with a law that unconstitutionally discriminates against teachers’ wearing of any religious garb.
The old ban on religious garb for teachers was originally enacted in order to target Catholic teachers.
Public school teachers wearing religious garb does not violate the Establishment Clause. For example, a Jewish teacher may wear a yamaka, a Catholic nun may wear a habit, a Christian teacher may wear a cross, and a Sikh teacher may wear a dastaar.
The old Pennsylvania law (now thankfully updated) is both unconstitutional and constitutes illegal religious discrimination by allowing teachers to wear all manner of secular symbols while banning the wearing of religious garb or symbolism.
S.B.84 passed and repealed this law and now protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools.
The Issue
Before SB 84, Pennsylvania law banned teachers, on penalty of a one-year suspension for a first violation and firing for a second offense, from wearing any type of religious garb, mark, emblem, or insignia indicating a teacher is a member of any religion.
The law prior to SB 84 stated:
Religious Garb, Insignia, etc., Prohibited; Penalty
(a) That no teacher in any public school shall wear in said school or while engaged in the performance of his duty as such teacher any dress, mark, emblem or insignia indicating the fact that such teacher is a member or adherent of any religious order, sect or denomination.
(b) Any teacher employed in any of the public schools of this Commonwealth, who violates the provisions of this section, shall be suspended from employment in such school for the term of one year, and in case of a second offense by the same teacher he shall be permanently disqualified from teaching in said school….
Pennsylvania was the very last state in our country to still have one of these antiquated prohibitions, which were promoted by the Ku Klux Klan due to its anti-Catholic sentiments. It was long overdue for Pennsylvania to remove this archaic, discriminatory, and anti-religious law from our Public School Code in order to protect religious teachers from unjust discrimination.
In 1908, a Mennonite teacher was fired from her public school job for wearing a head covering, and the Pennsylvania state court upheld the law. But in 2003, after a public school suspended an instructional assistant for wearing a cross necklace, Judge Arthur Schwab ruled in Nichol v. Arin Intermediate Unit 28 that the statute did not apply to the instructional assistant because she was employed by an intermediate unit rather than the school itself, and as such was not a teacher as defined in the statute. However, the ruling indicated the statute was likely unconstitutional if applied to teachers.
The Solution
Though some schools have stopped enforcing this law, the legislature put and end to it once and for all by passing SB 84. Now teachers in Pennsylvania won’t be put situations where they must choose to avoid the teaching profession because of the existence of this law, to avoid situations where their rights are chilled, or have to avoid situations where a school attempts to enforce this discriminatory and unconstitutional law, resulting in liability for the government.
S.B.84 repealed this law and protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools. According to a memo from the Prime Sponsor, Senator Phillips-Hill (R-York), “The senators’ proposal would eliminate a section from the state’s Education Code that prohibits a teacher from wearing any dress, mark emblem, or insignia indicative of his or her faith or denomination.”
“A teacher should not be worried about his or her job for simply wearing a cross on a necklace. Our First Amendment rights do not end simply because a teacher walks into a classroom,” Phillips-Hill said. “The Senate Education committee took an important step to protect our First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of religious expression.”

Related Articles
Atheist bully group at it again in Pennsylvania
The Freedom From Religion Foundation - a small group from Wisconsin that brings legal bullying to small communities - is at it again in our state. This is the group that sued two Pennsylvania school districts for their display of the Ten Commandments. And it was this...
Exclusive – Grandmother who refuses to conform beliefs speaks out
We encourage you to listen and share the story of Barronelle Stutzman - the 70-year-old grandmother being sued both personally and professionally for declining to make a floral arrangement for a same-sex wedding and referring three other florists for the job. "They're...
Response from Woman Sued for Beliefs on Marriage to Attorney General’s Settlement Offer
After a ruling this week that Arlene’s Flowers violated the law by declining to decorate for a same-sex ceremony, Washington’s Attorney General, Bob Ferguson, who initiated the legal action against the grandmother and small business owner, offered a settlement of...
30-Year Veteran Fireman Fired For His Faith
Kelvin Cochran has dedicated over 30 years of service to fighting fires. Now one of the most decorated Fire Chiefs in America was suspended, investigated and, despite investigators finding no cause for further action, was fired because of his Christian faith. "To...
Rep. Frankel’s HB 300 Would Authorize Personal Harm on Pennsylvanians
"Even if we were to legalize gay marriage, if a photographer had a personal reason for not wanting to photograph that wedding they would not be able to be sued or something would they?" - WITF Smart Talk host Nell McCormack Abom, asking PFI Chief Counsel Randall...
BREAKING: Court Authorizes “Personal Ruin” on Woman For Believing in Traditional Marriage
A judge has declared summary judgment against Barronelle Stutzman - the owner of Arlene's Flowers that was sued by both the state of Washington and two men over not providing flowers for a same-sex wedding ceremony. Without even going to trial, the court ordered that...
Supreme Court Brief Filed in Support of Choose-Life License Plate
We're asking the high court to stop censorship of pro-life speech. The Independence Law Center, in conjunction with Jonathan D. Christman of Fox Rothschild LLP, filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Children First Foundation, a pro-adoption nonprofit...
Planned Parenthood’s Formula for Sex Education
Warning: linked content is not suitable for children. Thousands of young people - starting as early as age 6 - are taught sex-ed by Planned Parenthood every year.¹ This education could be summed up by the following: Porn x (50 Shades of Grey + Abortion) = Sex-Ed by...

Videos
Analysis of Bostock Ruling
Conversation with Carl Trueman and Andrew Walker
Protecting Privacy and Religious Freedom – An American Ideal