Key Points:
-
A consortium of abortion clinics have sued Pennsylvania, arguing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should force taxpayers to fund abortion and to find (invent) a right to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
-
A win for the abortion industry in this case would force taxpayer funding of abortion, and would likely establish a right to an abortion in Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
-
If abortion is declared a constitutional right in Pennsylvania, all current and future pro-life regulations would be in jeopardy of being struck down
The Threat
The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.
The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should declare a right to abortion and taxpayer-funded abortions in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
A win for the abortion industry in this case would not only force taxpayers to fund abortion, but a court-imposed state-constitutional “right to abortion” could lead to all of Pennsylvania’s current pro-life laws being struck down,and could result in legalizing abortion right up until birth, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Any future pro-life laws enacted to protect women’s health and preborn babies lives would likely be struck down under such a ruling. Current pro-life regulations in the Abortion Control Act, such as the 24-hour waiting period requirements, informed consent, and 24 week abortion limit would be in jeopardy of being repealed and ruled unconstitutional. The same is true with abortion clinic regulations put into place to protect women, passed into our law after the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors” scandal.
In addition to the lawsuit, the Abortion Industry is also trying the legislative route. House Bill 1888 would also create a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion in Pennsylvania’s constitution and remove our current pro-life protections.
The Lawsuit Status:
The Commonwealth Court ruled against the abortion industry in the Allegheny Reproductive v. Pennsylvania case on March 26, 2021. But the abortion industry appealed to the PA Supreme Court. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that there is no “fundamental right” to abortion, but three justices (Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht) overruled longstanding precedent that prohibited taxpayer funding of elective abortions. Justices Donohue and Wecht expressed interest in recognizing a right to abortion, while Justices Sally Mundy and Debra Todd dissented, with Mundy arguing the issue should be resolved by the political branches, not the courts. Justice Kevin Brobson abstained, and there was a vacancy on the court. The case was remanded to the Commonwealth Court, which heard oral arguments in February 2025. Governor Josh Shapiro’s administration had announced early on that they would not defend the law but would advocate for striking down the Medicaid funding ban.
Conclusion:
If the Abortion Industry gets their way, the PA Supreme Court ruling would force state taxpayer funding of abortions, strike down parental consent and 24 hour waiting period requirements, end health and safety regulations to protect women at abortion clinics, and worse. And any future legislation to protect women and babies would be found unconstitutional. Pennsylvania would join a list of states where lawsuits have already resulted in those state supreme courts “finding” a right to abortion in their constitutions, thereby striking down pro-life laws just like ours.

Related Articles
US Supreme Court Acts to Endorse “Same Sex Marriage” by Not Acting to Hear State Appeals
The Pennsylvania Family Institute expressed disappointment and dismay at the decision by the United States Supreme Court not to take up cases emanating from several states regarding “same-sex marriage.” “By choosing not to hear these cases, the Justices are allowing...
To PA NOW president: “Porn doesn’t belong anywhere.”
From Michael Geer, president - Pennsylvania Family Institute I seriously question the judgment of PA National Organization for Women president Caryn Hunt, who said this about the emailed pornography scandal hitting state government officials: "If you don't know that...
Abortion giant thinks they should be teaching this to your kids
Planned Parenthood's Attack Shows Why You Need to Know Where Governor Candidates Stand on Protecting Your Family Planned Parenthood has released a statement attacking Gov. Corbett for being opposed to a proposed mandate that would force all public schools to teach...
New Report Shows Good News for Those with Down Syndrome
Today, in the Philly Inquirer, our friends at Susan B. Anthony List in D.C. highlight a new report showing good news for those with Down syndrome – extended life span, other physical treatments to improve quality of life, etc. Read the article. Unfortunately, many...
One Lawmaker Says You Don’t Deserve ‘A Place at the Table’!
No doubt you’ve read our warnings about two pieces of legislation being considered by our state senate and state house. Since June when a single federal judge overturned Pennsylvania’s marriage law declaring it unconstitutional, there has been a renewed push to grant...
Religious Liberty Threats Follow Marriage Redefinition
by Brandon McGinley It has long been contended by proponents of the traditional definition of marriage that with the abandonment of that definition will come assaults to the religious liberties we have long taken for granted. Naturally, those predictions were...
Planned Parenthood is Not a Friend to Women
Download the one-page handout (PDF, 236KB) Pennsylvania should not support Planned Parenthood because: Planned Parenthood is not a friend to women. Planned Parenthood is big business. Planned Parenthood = Abortion. No matter what. Planned Parenthood is not a friend to...
It’s Official – “Chloe’s Law” Makes PA Better
On July 18, Governor Tom Corbett sat down with Chloe Kondrich, a young girl from Pittsburgh, and signed into law an educational effort named after her. “Chloe’s Law” (HB 2111, Act 130) will now aid Pennsylvania parents and families by providing relevant information...