Issue
Keep Abortion Out of Pennsylvania’s Constitution
KEY POINTS
- A consortium of abortion clinics have sued Pennsylvania, arguing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should force taxpayers to fund abortion and to find (invent) a right to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
- A win for the abortion industry in this case would force taxpayer funding of abortion, and would likely establish a right to an abortion in Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
- If abortion is declared a constitutional right in Pennsylvania, all current and future pro-life regulations would be in jeopardy of being struck down
- The Pennsylvania State House passed HB1957 in December of 2025, a bill that would amend the Pennsylvania State Constitution to create a right to abortion on-demand until birth. It is expected to not be considered by Republican leadership in the Senate.
TAKE ACTION
Tell your legislators to OPPOSE HB1957
Act Now
The Threat
The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.
The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should declare a right to abortion and taxpayer-funded abortions in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
A win for the abortion industry in this case would not only force taxpayers to fund abortion, but a court-imposed state-constitutional “right to abortion” could lead to all of Pennsylvania’s current pro-life laws being struck down,and could result in legalizing abortion right up until birth, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Any future pro-life laws enacted to protect women’s health and preborn babies lives would likely be struck down under such a ruling. Current pro-life regulations in the Abortion Control Act, such as the 24-hour waiting period requirements, informed consent, and 24 week abortion limit would be in jeopardy of being repealed and ruled unconstitutional. The same is true with abortion clinic regulations put into place to protect women, passed into our law after the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors” scandal.
In addition to the lawsuit, the Abortion Industry is also trying the legislative route. House Bill 1957 would also create a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion in Pennsylvania’s constitution and remove our current pro-life protections.
The Lawsuit Status
The Commonwealth Court ruled against the abortion industry in the Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania case on March 26, 2021. The abortion industry appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which ruled that there is no “fundamental right” to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution. However, by a slim majority, the Court overturned a 40-year precedent that had prohibited taxpayer funding of elective abortions.
Three justices—Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht—overruled the longstanding precedent barring taxpayer-funded abortions. Justices Donohue and Wecht expressed interest in recognizing a constitutional right to abortion. Two justices—Sally Mundy and Debra Todd—dissented, with Justice Mundy arguing that the issue should be resolved by the political branches, not the courts. Justice Kevin Brobson abstained, and there was a vacancy on the court at the time.
The case was remanded back to the Commonwealth Court, which heard oral arguments again on November 5, 2025, in Pittsburgh. The case is expected to return to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for final resolution.
Conclusion
If the Abortion Industry gets their way, the PA Supreme Court ruling would force state taxpayer funding of abortions, strike down parental consent and 24 hour waiting period requirements, end health and safety regulations to protect women at abortion clinics, and worse. And any future legislation to protect women and babies would be found unconstitutional. Pennsylvania would join a list of states where lawsuits have already resulted in those state supreme courts “finding” a right to abortion in their constitutions, thereby striking down pro-life laws just like ours.
Related Articles
Author of God and Ronald Reagan Speaking in Lancaster
Tuesday, July 26 Good Shepherd Chapel Lancaster Bible College Lancaster, PALecture - Q&A: 7:00-8:30pm Hear Dr. Paul Kengor, prominent expert on Ronald Reagan and the fall of Communism. Dr. Kengor is a professor of Political Science at Grove City College, and...
Are You A Huper? Washington Post Writer Discovers Boys & Girls are Different…
...But remains among those who want to change that fact. The reality of the created order has often been resisted or denied, but what is is, like it or not. I stumbled across this column from the Washington Post this morning, and I think it displays the radical...
Victory for Independence Law Center
Just got word from our chief counsel, Randy Wenger, that the Independence Law Center won a victory for Child Evangelism Fellowship in a dispute with the Harrisburg School District over "Good News Clubs." More details to come.
Important Pro-Life Votes Coming up (As early as Monday, May 23rd)
5-19-11 Important Pro-Life Votes Coming up (As early as Monday, May 23rd) Your State Senator Needs to Hear From You Please call your State Senator on Two Key Pro-life Votes: 1. Ask your State Senator to support the Mensch Amendment to Senate Bill 732. The Mensch...
Sensible Abortion Clinic Regulations Pass PA House 148-43!
(Harrisburg, May 11, 2011) For Immediate Release In an historic vote,the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in an overwhelming vote, adopted House Bill 574, which would apply the same licensure and safety standards on abortion clinics that all other outpatient...
The Lyin’ King: A Must Read.
(written in response to the major DC law firm King & Spalding dropping its representation defending the Defense of Marriage Act due to pressure from homosexual groups. From FRC's Daily Briefing 4-26-11) Attorneys at King & Spalding probably thought that...
Pa. should bolster abortion clinic oversight
From PFI's very own Dan Bartkowiak: "If you constantly demand access to safe, legal and critical care for women seeking abortions, you must agree that our abortion facilities, with doctors performing surgical procedures, be held to the same health standard of every...
Defending DOMA
This Letter to the Editor appeared in The Patriot News on March 22: The Federal Defense of Marriage Act must be defended to ensure the integrity of our government and the protection of state rights defining marriage. Our president has no right to act as judge and sole...
