Issue
Discrimination Against Religious Public School Teachers in PA
Update: The Religious Garb Bill, Senate Bill 84, has passed and been signed into law! Teachers in Pennsylvania are now free to wear religious symbols.

Pictured, L to R: Dan Bartkowiak, Director of Communications at PA Family; Jeremy Samek, Senior Counsel at the Independence Law Center; Sen. Judy Schwank; Sen. Kristin Phillips-Hill; Hank Butler of the Jewish Coalition; Eric Failing of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference; and Tom Shaheen, Vice President for Policy at PA Family.
Key Points:
Pennsylvania was the last state in the U.S. with a law that unconstitutionally discriminates against teachers’ wearing of any religious garb.
The old ban on religious garb for teachers was originally enacted in order to target Catholic teachers.
Public school teachers wearing religious garb does not violate the Establishment Clause. For example, a Jewish teacher may wear a yamaka, a Catholic nun may wear a habit, a Christian teacher may wear a cross, and a Sikh teacher may wear a dastaar.
The old Pennsylvania law (now thankfully updated) is both unconstitutional and constitutes illegal religious discrimination by allowing teachers to wear all manner of secular symbols while banning the wearing of religious garb or symbolism.
S.B.84 passed and repealed this law and now protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools.
The Issue
Before SB 84, Pennsylvania law banned teachers, on penalty of a one-year suspension for a first violation and firing for a second offense, from wearing any type of religious garb, mark, emblem, or insignia indicating a teacher is a member of any religion.
The law prior to SB 84 stated:
Religious Garb, Insignia, etc., Prohibited; Penalty
(a) That no teacher in any public school shall wear in said school or while engaged in the performance of his duty as such teacher any dress, mark, emblem or insignia indicating the fact that such teacher is a member or adherent of any religious order, sect or denomination.
(b) Any teacher employed in any of the public schools of this Commonwealth, who violates the provisions of this section, shall be suspended from employment in such school for the term of one year, and in case of a second offense by the same teacher he shall be permanently disqualified from teaching in said school….
Pennsylvania was the very last state in our country to still have one of these antiquated prohibitions, which were promoted by the Ku Klux Klan due to its anti-Catholic sentiments. It was long overdue for Pennsylvania to remove this archaic, discriminatory, and anti-religious law from our Public School Code in order to protect religious teachers from unjust discrimination.
In 1908, a Mennonite teacher was fired from her public school job for wearing a head covering, and the Pennsylvania state court upheld the law. But in 2003, after a public school suspended an instructional assistant for wearing a cross necklace, Judge Arthur Schwab ruled in Nichol v. Arin Intermediate Unit 28 that the statute did not apply to the instructional assistant because she was employed by an intermediate unit rather than the school itself, and as such was not a teacher as defined in the statute. However, the ruling indicated the statute was likely unconstitutional if applied to teachers.
The Solution
Though some schools have stopped enforcing this law, the legislature put and end to it once and for all by passing SB 84. Now teachers in Pennsylvania won’t be put situations where they must choose to avoid the teaching profession because of the existence of this law, to avoid situations where their rights are chilled, or have to avoid situations where a school attempts to enforce this discriminatory and unconstitutional law, resulting in liability for the government.
S.B.84 repealed this law and protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools. According to a memo from the Prime Sponsor, Senator Phillips-Hill (R-York), “The senators’ proposal would eliminate a section from the state’s Education Code that prohibits a teacher from wearing any dress, mark emblem, or insignia indicative of his or her faith or denomination.”
“A teacher should not be worried about his or her job for simply wearing a cross on a necklace. Our First Amendment rights do not end simply because a teacher walks into a classroom,” Phillips-Hill said. “The Senate Education committee took an important step to protect our First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of religious expression.”

Related Articles
Listen: Chief Counsel Randall Wenger on the Marriage decision
Randall Wenger, chief counsel for Pennsylvania Family Institute, appeared last Saturday, May 24th on the Spotlight Radio Program with Greg Barton. Wenger talked about last week's Federal court ruling overturning Pennsylvania's marriage law, and Governor Corbett's...
US Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Prayer
NY Daily News: In a 5-to-4 decision, the court ruled that the tradition in the town of Greece, a Rochester suburb, does not denigrate non-Christians and that such invocation does not have to be nondenominational. The decision — the first on this thorny issue in three...
The Price of Personal Beliefs
By: Dan Bartkowiak Living out your values has become a huge issue in today's culture war - and the freedom to do so is taking a hit. Elaine Huguenin declined to photograph a same-sex ceremony. Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has turned down her case, she is left...
Pennsylvania Family Institute: Will PA Business Owners Finally Get Relief?
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Press Release: Monday March 24, 2014 Will Pennsylvania Family Business Owners Finally Get Relief at US Supreme Court? High Court to Hear Landmark Case on Religious Freedom and the HHS Mandate Tomorrow (Harrisburg, PA) - The U.S. Supreme...
Independence Law Center: Supreme Court takes on Religious Freedom
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - Monday March 24, 2014 CONTACT: Randall Wenger, Esq. 717-657-4990 Chief Counsel, Independence Law Center The Supreme Court takes on Religious Freedom in Case filed by Lancaster County business and its owners (Harrisburg, PA) - The Hahn family,...
The Social Issues – Conservatives vs. Libertarians
By: Kate Boyle One of the hottest topics at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) this year in D.C. was the difference between conservatives and libertarians on social issues. It was evident that there are factions within the Republican Party and they...
Christian Home School Family Allowed to Stay!
by Kate Boyle Homeschooling has been illegal in Germany since it was outlawed by Adolf Hitler in 1938. For that reason, Uwe and Hannelore Romeike came to America seeking religious and educational freedom for themselves and their family. In 2006, the Romeike's removed...
8 Things You Should Know About This Year’s Critical Supreme Court Case (Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Sebelius)
One month from today, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on the case Conestoga Wood Specialties v Sebelius. Here are eight things you should know about the case: The Hahn Family, a Lancaster County (Pennsylvania) Mennonite family, owns Conestoga Wood...

Videos
Analysis of Bostock Ruling
Conversation with Carl Trueman and Andrew Walker
Protecting Privacy and Religious Freedom – An American Ideal