Issue
Discrimination Against Religious Public School Teachers in PA
Update: The Religious Garb Bill, Senate Bill 84, has passed and been signed into law! Teachers in Pennsylvania are now free to wear religious symbols.

Pictured, L to R: Dan Bartkowiak, Director of Communications at PA Family; Jeremy Samek, Senior Counsel at the Independence Law Center; Sen. Judy Schwank; Sen. Kristin Phillips-Hill; Hank Butler of the Jewish Coalition; Eric Failing of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference; and Tom Shaheen, Vice President for Policy at PA Family.
Key Points:
Pennsylvania was the last state in the U.S. with a law that unconstitutionally discriminates against teachers’ wearing of any religious garb.
The old ban on religious garb for teachers was originally enacted in order to target Catholic teachers.
Public school teachers wearing religious garb does not violate the Establishment Clause. For example, a Jewish teacher may wear a yamaka, a Catholic nun may wear a habit, a Christian teacher may wear a cross, and a Sikh teacher may wear a dastaar.
The old Pennsylvania law (now thankfully updated) is both unconstitutional and constitutes illegal religious discrimination by allowing teachers to wear all manner of secular symbols while banning the wearing of religious garb or symbolism.
S.B.84 passed and repealed this law and now protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools.
The Issue
Before SB 84, Pennsylvania law banned teachers, on penalty of a one-year suspension for a first violation and firing for a second offense, from wearing any type of religious garb, mark, emblem, or insignia indicating a teacher is a member of any religion.
The law prior to SB 84 stated:
Religious Garb, Insignia, etc., Prohibited; Penalty
(a) That no teacher in any public school shall wear in said school or while engaged in the performance of his duty as such teacher any dress, mark, emblem or insignia indicating the fact that such teacher is a member or adherent of any religious order, sect or denomination.
(b) Any teacher employed in any of the public schools of this Commonwealth, who violates the provisions of this section, shall be suspended from employment in such school for the term of one year, and in case of a second offense by the same teacher he shall be permanently disqualified from teaching in said school….
Pennsylvania was the very last state in our country to still have one of these antiquated prohibitions, which were promoted by the Ku Klux Klan due to its anti-Catholic sentiments. It was long overdue for Pennsylvania to remove this archaic, discriminatory, and anti-religious law from our Public School Code in order to protect religious teachers from unjust discrimination.
In 1908, a Mennonite teacher was fired from her public school job for wearing a head covering, and the Pennsylvania state court upheld the law. But in 2003, after a public school suspended an instructional assistant for wearing a cross necklace, Judge Arthur Schwab ruled in Nichol v. Arin Intermediate Unit 28 that the statute did not apply to the instructional assistant because she was employed by an intermediate unit rather than the school itself, and as such was not a teacher as defined in the statute. However, the ruling indicated the statute was likely unconstitutional if applied to teachers.
The Solution
Though some schools have stopped enforcing this law, the legislature put and end to it once and for all by passing SB 84. Now teachers in Pennsylvania won’t be put situations where they must choose to avoid the teaching profession because of the existence of this law, to avoid situations where their rights are chilled, or have to avoid situations where a school attempts to enforce this discriminatory and unconstitutional law, resulting in liability for the government.
S.B.84 repealed this law and protects religious teachers in Pennsylvania schools. According to a memo from the Prime Sponsor, Senator Phillips-Hill (R-York), “The senators’ proposal would eliminate a section from the state’s Education Code that prohibits a teacher from wearing any dress, mark emblem, or insignia indicative of his or her faith or denomination.”
“A teacher should not be worried about his or her job for simply wearing a cross on a necklace. Our First Amendment rights do not end simply because a teacher walks into a classroom,” Phillips-Hill said. “The Senate Education committee took an important step to protect our First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and freedom of religious expression.”

Related Articles
Parents: Seize this Opportunity to Choose Your Children’s Education
By: Emily Kreps As a mom here in Pennsylvania, I understand the stress that many parents are feeling and the questions we're wondering as we approach this school year. Will Governor Wolf close the schools before they even open, or one month into opening? How long will...
The New Gathering Capacity Limit Order Does Not Apply to Churches
Today we want to give you a briefing on the new orders from the Governor and the PA Department Of Health announced yesterday. Many of you are most likely wondering how this order pertains to churches and church life. 1. The New Gathering Capacity Limit Order...
Little Sisters, Religious Freedom Win at SCOTUS despite PA AG Shapiro’s Legal Attack
(HARRISBURG, PA - July 8, 2020) Pennsylvania Family Institute applauds today’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Little Sisters of the Poor v Pennsylvania, a case dealing with religious exemption to the HHS mandate requiring coverage of abortion-causing drugs in...
Further Guidance and Suggestions on Face Coverings Order
For Pastors and Church leaders - from Kurt Weaver and our Church Ambassador Network. As promised, we wanted to give you more information in regards to the latest Universal Face Covering Order:Last Wednesday, July 1st, the Governor and Secretary of Health announced...
What does Pennsylvania’s new face mask order mean for churches?
Update: See a Pastors Briefing email from Kurt Weaver (Director, Church Ambassador Network) with further insights into this new order. The Pennsylvania Department of Health has issued an updated order for face coverings and now churches across Pennsylvania are...
Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Faith-Based Foster Care in Philadelphia
The Supreme Court of the United States yesterday granted review in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, a case involving Philadelphia’s decision to prohibit Catholic Social Services from placing foster children in foster homes due to Catholic Social Services’ beliefs about...
Christian Mail Carrier Discharged for Not Delivering Packages on Sunday Asks Federal Court for Judgment
(LANCASTER, PA) On Friday, February 14, a United States Postal Service (USPS) mailman filed a Motion for Summary Judgement before a federal district judge asking the court to find that the USPS violated his rights when it failed to accommodate his religious beliefs...
Proposed State Bills Would Harm Freedoms, Not Promote Tolerance and Diversity
Everyone should be treated with dignity and respect yet Senate Bill 224, Senate Bill 614 and House Bill 1404 would harm good people. Protections for religious freedom and privacy rights here in Pennsylvania are in jeopardy with a renewed push to change Pennsylvania’s...

Videos
Analysis of Bostock Ruling
Conversation with Carl Trueman and Andrew Walker
Protecting Privacy and Religious Freedom – An American Ideal