Key Points:
-
A consortium of abortion clinics have sued Pennsylvania, arguing that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court should force taxpayers to fund abortion and to find (invent) a right to abortion in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
-
A win for the abortion industry in this case would force taxpayer funding of abortion, and would likely establish a right to an abortion in Pennsylvania’s Constitution.
-
If abortion is declared a constitutional right in Pennsylvania, all current and future pro-life regulations would be in jeopardy of being struck down
The Threat
The Pennsylvania Constitution contains no right to an abortion or to taxpayer funded abortions, but the abortion industry is asking the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to find (invent) one in a case they filed, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Pennsylvania Department of Human Services.
The case, brought by a consortium of abortion clinics (including Planned Parenthood) argues that the court should declare a right to abortion and taxpayer-funded abortions in the Pennsylvania Constitution.
A win for the abortion industry in this case would not only force taxpayers to fund abortion, but a court-imposed state-constitutional “right to abortion” could lead to all of Pennsylvania’s current pro-life laws being struck down,and could result in legalizing abortion right up until birth, paid for with taxpayer dollars. Any future pro-life laws enacted to protect women’s health and preborn babies lives would likely be struck down under such a ruling. Current pro-life regulations in the Abortion Control Act, such as the 24-hour waiting period requirements, informed consent, and 24 week abortion limit would be in jeopardy of being repealed and ruled unconstitutional. The same is true with abortion clinic regulations put into place to protect women, passed into our law after the Kermit Gosnell “House of Horrors” scandal.
In addition to the lawsuit, the Abortion Industry is also trying the legislative route. House Bill 1888 would also create a constitutional amendment to enshrine abortion in Pennsylvania’s constitution and remove our current pro-life protections.
The Lawsuit Status:
The Commonwealth Court ruled against the abortion industry in the Allegheny Reproductive v. Pennsylvania case on March 26, 2021. But the abortion industry appealed to the PA Supreme Court. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that there is no “fundamental right” to abortion, but three justices (Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht) overruled longstanding precedent that prohibited taxpayer funding of elective abortions. Justices Donohue and Wecht expressed interest in recognizing a right to abortion, while Justices Sally Mundy and Debra Todd dissented, with Mundy arguing the issue should be resolved by the political branches, not the courts. Justice Kevin Brobson abstained, and there was a vacancy on the court. The case was remanded to the Commonwealth Court, which heard oral arguments in February 2025. Governor Josh Shapiro’s administration had announced early on that they would not defend the law but would advocate for striking down the Medicaid funding ban.
Conclusion:
If the Abortion Industry gets their way, the PA Supreme Court ruling would force state taxpayer funding of abortions, strike down parental consent and 24 hour waiting period requirements, end health and safety regulations to protect women at abortion clinics, and worse. And any future legislation to protect women and babies would be found unconstitutional. Pennsylvania would join a list of states where lawsuits have already resulted in those state supreme courts “finding” a right to abortion in their constitutions, thereby striking down pro-life laws just like ours.

Related Articles
Canada Judge: Infanticide Allowed
Pro-life advocates have been speaking out about the importance of life for over 30 years. We've been warning that a society that does not value the life of the unborn will soon not value the life of those who are born. Now, sadly, we have a case in point: An Alberta...
Strong Preference Given to Pro-Abortion Groups for Anti-Sex Trafficking Grants
U.S. Health officials are prioritizing abortion-friendly clinics over pro-life and religious facilities in handing out grants to help sex trafficking victims. Planned Parenthood clinics, which will likely benefit significantly from the grant prioritization, have been...
President Obama Goes After Pro-Life Sidewalk Counselors
NPR reports, Obama is deciding to crack down on those protesting, conducting sidewalk counseling, or even praying for the mothers and their babies. None of this is surprising. This President, as a State Senator, voted against a bill requiring doctors to care for...
The Chilling of Our First Amendment Rights
An absolute MUST read by Maggie Gallagher. Chilling indeed. (First published on National Review Online) The Chilling of Our First Amendment Rights - By Maggie Gallagher - The Corner - National Review Online.
Are You A Huper? Washington Post Writer Discovers Boys & Girls are Different…
...But remains among those who want to change that fact. The reality of the created order has often been resisted or denied, but what is is, like it or not. I stumbled across this column from the Washington Post this morning, and I think it displays the radical...
Important Pro-Life Votes Coming up (As early as Monday, May 23rd)
5-19-11 Important Pro-Life Votes Coming up (As early as Monday, May 23rd) Your State Senator Needs to Hear From You Please call your State Senator on Two Key Pro-life Votes: 1. Ask your State Senator to support the Mensch Amendment to Senate Bill 732. The Mensch...
Sensible Abortion Clinic Regulations Pass PA House 148-43!
(Harrisburg, May 11, 2011) For Immediate Release In an historic vote,the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in an overwhelming vote, adopted House Bill 574, which would apply the same licensure and safety standards on abortion clinics that all other outpatient...
Medical Marijuana in Michigan: “Out of Control”
"Medical Marijuana" has been proposed in legislation in the PA Senate. This Lansing State Journal story shows that pot use for medical purposes is "out of control," and that there is a small number of physicians writing the vast number of prescriptions for unspecified...