HB 836: Preserving Access to Reproductive Efforts Non-Traditional Act (PARENT Act)

Pros

  • Protects access to fertility treatment and helps prevent state interference in care.
  • Provides clarity for patients and providers by stating the Commonwealth may not interfere with medically appropriate ART.
  • Could reduce uncertainty as laws change by making later laws subject to this protection unless specifically exempted.
  • https://resolve.org/
  • https://www.acog.org/womens-health/search (search IVF)

Cons

  • https://pafamily.org/ivf/ 
  • May be viewed as limiting future legislative flexibility by automatically subjecting later laws to this protection.
  • Opponents could argue the bill is too broad because it uses general language about “medically appropriate” ART rather than narrower rules.
  • Critics concerned about reproductive policy may argue it moves too far toward statutory protection of fertility treatments without additional regulatory limits.
  • https://www.cdc.gov/reproductive-health/about/index.html