Issue


Standards for Explicit Sexual Content in Schools

 KEY POINTS

  • School Boards are legally permitted to create policy setting standards for preventing age-inappropriate sexually explicit content in their curriculum and library.
  • The standard ought not be: “As long as this book doesn’t land us in jail for giving it to a minor, the sexually explicit content is welcome in our curriculum or the school library.”
  • Written policy protects students, parents, employees, and the school
    and ensures better educational content will fill the finite space in curriculum and in libraries.
  • Schools should prioritize material that provides rich educational value over material that may provide similar value but also has age-inappropriate sexually explicit content.
  • Age-Appropriate policies are not directed at viewpoint and are not banning the book from student possession. They are exercising the schools prerogative to determine what to include in its own library and curriculum.

Standards for Sexually Explicit Content in Schools

Schools must engage in line-drawing for age appropriateness of sexually explicit content in their library and curriculum. Criminal laws are one required line prohibiting schools from giving materials to minors in curriculum or library that a court deems pornographic or obscene. But what about sexually explicit content that does not rise to the extremely high bar of criminal law?

School boards are legally permitted to articulate standards that go beyond “would we land in jail for giving this book to a minor?” to prevent other age-inappropriate sexually explicit content in their curriculum and school library. Unfortunately, many schools have no policy standards for sexually explicit material beyond criminal law.

Schools with written age-appropriate standards for sexually explicit materials that differ for elementary, middle, and high schools protect students and ensures better educational content will fill the finite space in curriculum and in libraries.

But such written policies also protect the school’s staff and district from costly litigation. Even without written policy, a school librarian, principal, or school board is permitted to remove a particular title they deem age-inappropriate sexually explicit material. But with written policy standards, the school is less susceptible to baseless allegations that the title was removed for an impermissible viewpoint discriminatory reason.

School employees still have wide discretion to select and purchase books that comport with the age-appropriate standards in written policy set by the school board, and from that universe of materials, parents then have ultimate authority to make additional age-appropriate determinations for their own child and should have authority to restrict certain titles for their own child.

Individuals who desire to see sexually explicit materials in the hands of minors sometimes argue that such policies are “book bans.” Attempts at labeling common-sense school standards as “book bans” have been rejected by courts, most recently in August of 2022 by a federal court in Missouri.

A parent, for example, who wants to buy sexually explicit books for their own child to read are not prevented from doing so by such school policies. School policies setting forth its own age-appropriate standards for sexually explicit content in its own curriculum and school library do not even prohibit a student from bringing their own book to school or from reading it in an appropriate time, such as study hall. But school districts do not have to put such explicit books in their own curriculum or in the school library, and such a decision by the school is not a ban on books.

Such policies treat inappropriate sexually explicit content the same regardless of whether the sexually explicit depictions or descriptions happen to be between straight, gay, or even a lone person. As such the argument made by those who desire to see sexually explicit materials in the hands of minors, that these policies are directed at LGBT people, is false.

Too many schools lack baseline standards regarding sexually explicit content in school libraries. Schools ought to spend the finite time in the day on academic excellence, and sexually explicit content detracts from that. Explicit sexual depictions and descriptions may sell, but refusal to purchase it is no ban. Districts can decide not to buy and stock sexually explicit content. If you are a school board member who desires to implement such a policy, we are glad to assist you.

Related Articles

Obama Leads Party to Defeat Gendercide Ban

From Lifenews.com: Democrats in the House of Representatives prevented passage of a bill that would ban sex-selection abortions. The legislation needed a two-thirds vote and Democrats voted overwhelmingly against the legislation after President Barack Obama and...

read more

9am Thurs. May 31: TV Debate – Marriage in PA

Randy Wenger, Chief Counsel for our Independence Law Center, debates in support of marriage on PCN & we're asking if you'd be able to help us with 3 action steps: PCN Live Call-In Show with Randy Wenger, Esq. Tonight, Wednesday, May 30th 7:00pm - 8:00pm Repeat,...

read more

Planned Parenthood Gendercide

Lila Rose and the Live Action team released a new video on Tuesday showing gendercide at Planned Parenthood. The video is first in a new series titled “Gendercide: Sex-Selection in America,” exposing the practice of sex-selective abortion in the United States and how...

read more

Support for Traditional Marriage Still Overwhelming in PA

by Brandon McGinley A poll released today by Public Policy Polling indicates that, despite President Obama's declaration of support for same-sex "marriage" and despite widespread efforts to stigmatize supporters of traditional marriage, only 35% of Pennsylvanians...

read more

Funding Women’s Health, Not Abortion

For Immediate Release May 23, 2012 (Harrisburg, PA) - “It’s time for Planned Parenthood to come clean,” announced Thomas Shaheen, Vice-President for Policy of the Pennsylvania Family Council. “They claim they do not use taxpayer dollars to pay for abortions. Yet one...

read more

Sleeping Giant?

by Brandon McGinley As was widely reported yesterday, 43 Catholic dioceses and institutions, including the Archdioceses of New York and Washington, DC, and the University of Notre Dame,  filed suit against the federal government over the unprecedented attack on...

read more

Who is speaking at City on the Hill 2012?

Part of the experience of City on the Hill is our students engaging with some of today's most influential and effective leaders. Those leaders for this summer's 12th annual City on the Hill (July 22-28) will be:     Glenn Stanton, Director for Family Formation...

read more