In a significant victory for pro-life advocacy, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a crucial decision in the case of Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, affirming that states possess the authority to determine which providers are qualified to receive Medicaid funding. This decision marks a pivotal step forward in efforts to stop taxpayer funding of abortion providers like Planned Parenthood.
In 2018, the South Carolina Department of Health & Human Services determined that abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, were unqualified for state Medicaid funding. Citing a state law that prohibits the use of public funds for abortion, South Carolina terminated Planned Parenthood’s participation in Medicaid, ensuring other healthcare entities could offer comprehensive women’s health services without promoting abortion.
Planned Parenthood and Julie Edwards, a state resident demanding Medicaid services specifically through Planned Parenthood, challenged this decision. They argued that Medicaid recipients should be able to override state provider approval processes and sue in federal court if their preferred providers were disqualified. However, the Supreme Court’s ruling rejected this claim, solidifying the right of states to uphold their healthcare priorities without undue federal interference.
The Independence Law Center played a supporting role in South Carolina’s case by filing an amicus curiae brief on behalf of Family Policy Alliance and family policy councils from 36 states, including the Pennsylvania Family Council. Janice L. Martino-Gottshall, Senior Counsel for the Independence Law Center, summarized the brief’s key arguments, stating:
“Our brief emphasized that Medicaid was designed as a cooperative federal-state program, not as a blank check for litigation. Allowing private lawsuits would drain the very resources meant for low-income families and undermine the flexibility states need to ensure that Medicaid providers align with their health and moral priorities. This ruling restores balance to Medicaid’s design and affirms that states can—and must—set standards that best serve their citizens.”
Judge Cheryl Lynn Allen (Ret.), Of Counsel with Independence Law Center, further elaborated on the significance of this decision:
“The Supreme Court’s ruling in Medina v. Planned Parenthood is a significant win for state authority, patient care, and constitutional balance. States must be allowed to determine which providers are qualified to serve their vulnerable populations, without being overruled by federal courts at the behest of special interest groups. Allowing a private right of action would not only violate the structure of Medicaid but also harm the very people Medicaid was designed to help by diverting limited funds away from patient care and into litigation.”
This ruling aligns directly with ongoing efforts led by the Pennsylvania Family Council and our allies nationwide to defund Planned Parenthood and redirect resources to authentic healthcare providers that respect life and prioritize women’s well-being. Earlier this year, Pennsylvania Family Council proudly joined over 150 national and state pro-life organizations in urging Congress to halt taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood. Michael Geer, President of the Pennsylvania Family Council, emphasized, “Planned Parenthood’s track record in Pennsylvania is one of harm and deception—from failing health inspections to pushing abortion as their top priority while neglecting real healthcare for women. Taxpayers should not be forced to fund an organization that profits from taking innocent lives and ultimately harms women.”
Back in February, the New York Times exposed numerous failures within Planned Parenthood facilities nationwide, including unsafe conditions, negligent practices, and severe harm to women. These revelations reaffirm the necessity of redirecting public funds away from Planned Parenthood to trustworthy healthcare providers.
If there’s any state that needs to monitor abortion facilities, it’s Pennsylvania. Our state has witnessed firsthand the devastating impact of unregulated abortion facilities, epitomized by the horrors of Kermit Gosnell’s clinic. For decades abortion facilities were treated differently and without health inspections, allowing clinics like Gosnell to butcher women and babies. And Gosnell was not alone in taking advantage of these lax laws, which have since been improved by making abortion facilities follow the same rules and regulations as every other surgical facility in the state.
Further, Planned Parenthood’s disturbing expansion into Pennsylvania’s school systems and local elections highlights their prioritization of political activism over genuine healthcare. The Medina decision strengthens the stance that taxpayer dollars should never support an organization whose core operations contradict basic principles of care and protection for women and children.
In Pennsylvania, it is crucial to seize this momentum and call upon state lawmakers to follow South Carolina’s lead. Pennsylvania should enact clear legislation affirming the state’s right to defund abortion providers like Planned Parenthood. We must ensure our tax dollars are used to genuinely support women and children rather than funding an industry responsible for harming both.
The Pennsylvania Family Council remains committed to advocating for policies that protect life and promote authentic healthcare solutions. We urge Pennsylvanians to reach out to their elected representatives today and demand that our state take decisive action to stop funding Planned Parenthood and prioritize policies that truly protect the most vulnerable among us. Together, we can ensure a healthier, safer, and more compassionate future for Pennsylvania women and families.
➡️ Take action today!
Tell your lawmakers to stop sending our tax dollars to big abortion!
